Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 28;7(5):e00677. doi: 10.1002/brb3.677

Table 5.

Prevalence of arterial hypertension and diabetes according to MWA levels in CMI and IIH patients

Total Comorbidity Crude estimate Age‐adjusted estimate
Yes (%) No (%) OR (95% CI), p‐value OR (95% CI), p‐value
Arterial hypertension
CMI: MWA <4 mmHg 12 1 (8.3) 11 (91.7) 0.49 (0.06–3.83), = .500 1.77 (0.20–16.1), = .610
CMI: MWA ≥4 mmHg 36 2 (5.6) 34 (94.4) 0.32 (0.08–1.33), = .117 1.01 (0.23–4.54), = .987
HUNT3 42,461 6,597 (15.5) 35,864 (84.5) Control group Control group
IIH: MWA <4 mmHg 8 0 (0) 8 (100) Not defined Not defined
IIH: MWA ≥4 mmHg 44 7 (15.9) 37 (84.1) 1.02 (0.46–2.31), = .946 4.11 (1.64–10.3), = .003
HUNT3 42,461 6,597 (15.5) 35,864 (84.5) Control group Control group
Diabetes
CMI: MWA <4 mmHg 12 0 (0) 12 (100) Not defined Not defined
CMI: MWA ≥4 mmHg 36 2 (5.6) 34 (94.4) 1.66 (0.40–6.92), = .486 4.02 (0.94–17.3), = .061
HUNT3 42,461 1,453 (3.4) 41,008 (96.6) Control group Control group
IIH: MWA <4 mmHg 8 3 (37.5) 5 (62.5) 16.9 (4.0–70.9), < .001 50.2 (10.8–232.5), < .001
IIH: MWA ≥4 mmHg 44 2 (4.6) 42 (95.4) 1.34 (0.33–5.56), = .683 3.24 (0.76–13.8), = .111
HUNT3 42,461 1,453 (3.4) 41,008 (96.6) Control group Control group

CMI, Chiari malformation type I; MWA, mean wave amplitude; HUNT3, The HUNT3 Survey; IIH, idiopathic intracranial hypertension; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Data presented as numbers (percentages in parenthesis) and statistically assessed with logistic regression analysis.