Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Cell. 2017 Mar 17;40(6):595–607.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.02.017

Figure 5. Foxh1 marks enhancers prior to the recruitment of RNA Polymerase II.

Figure 5

A) Temporal expression patterns of three Foxh1 target genes (left) (Owens et al., 2016). Vertical red lines indicate stage 6 (32-cell) and the major onset of ZGA is indicated by a graded arrow. (Right) Foxh1 and RNA Polymerase II ChIP-seq at Foxh1 target genes gsc (scaffold_8:62,410,054-62,437,258), nodal1 (scaffold_3:5,668,910-5,678,946), and cer1 (scaffold_1:102,363,664-102,374,648). Boxed enhancers were interrogated at stage 6 for Foxh1 binding (panel B), and via qPCR in Figure S3A. B) Foxh1 ChIP-qPCR on stage 6 embryos. Shown is the mean fold enrichment over the eef1a1 background region for two biological replicates +/− SEM C) Heatmaps displaying RNA pol II ChIP-seq signal centered on the transcription start site (TSS) of all Foxh1-associated genes. Gene bodies are oriented to the right. Heatmap gene order is based on K-means clustering at stage 10.5, where clusters 1–3 were collectively called RNA pol II ‘associated’ (cluster boundaries not indicated in figure), and cluster 4 was called ‘not associated.’ Stage 12 and 16 RNA pol II ChIP-seq is from Hontelez et al. (2015). D) Temporal expression patterns of Foxh1 genes ‘associated’ and ‘not associated’ with RNA pol II. The rdRNA-seq (Owens et al., 2016) expression level for each gene was normalized between [0, 1] and clustered using K-means (see also Figure S4).