Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 18;88(3):248–254. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1278345

Table 2.

Comparison of reverse hybrid THAs and cemented THAs in corresponding age groups regarding risk of revision. Cemented THAs were defined as 1 when calculating RR. Cox analysis was used, with adjustment for gender, primary diagnosis, and period

Age group RRa CI (95%) p-value
< 55 years
 All revisions 0.9 0.8–1.0 0.07
 Fracture 1.4 0.8–2.5 0.3
 Infection 0.7 0.5–1.1 0.08
 Loosening 0.9 0.7–1.1 0.2
 Dislocation 0.8 0.5–1.1 0.2
55–64 years
 All revisions 1.1 1.0–1.3 0.013
 Fracture 3.1 2.2–4.5 <0.001
 Infection 1.1 0.8–1.4 0.7
 Loosening 1.1 0.9–1.3 0.5
 Dislocation 0.8 0.6–1.0 0.1
65–74 years
 All revisions 1.5 1.3–1.7 <0.001
 Fracture 4.0 2.9–5.3 <0.001
 Infection 1.1 0.9–1.3 0.6
 Loosening 1.6 1.4–2.0 <0.001
 Dislocation 0.8 0.6–1.0 0.08
> 74 years
 All revisions 2.0 1.8–2.3 <0.001
 Fracture 5.8 4.3–7.9 <0.001
 Infection 1.7 1.3–2.1 <0.001
 Loosening 2.6 2.0–3.5 <0.001
 Dislocation 1.2 0.9–1.6 0.2
a

Cemented THA same age group =1