Table 1.

Distribution of course evaluation.

Question	Rating	Group I 2002 n (%)	Group II 2003 n (%)	χ2	p
1. Use made of timetabled hours available for the subject	1	95 (88%)	101 (89%)
	2	13 (12%)	12 (11%)	0.1106079	> 0.05
	3	0	0
2. Lecturers' concern for students'	1	85 (79%)	98 (87%)
learning	2	14 (13%)	9 (8%)	2.4986106	> 0.05
	3	9 (8%)	6 (5%)
3. Clarity of theory classes and lecturers' teaching abilities	1	72 (67%)	98 (87%)
	2	31 (29%)	12 (11%)	12.765231	< 0.05 *
	3	5 (4%)	3 (2 %)
4. Lecturers' punctuality	1	108 (100%)	81 (72%)
	2	0	32 (28%)	32.620532	< 0.001 *
	3	0	0
5. Quality of knowledge assessment tests	1	38 (35%)	73 (65%)
	2	49 (45%)	34 (30%)	21.978341	< 0.001 *
	3	21 (20%)	6 (5 %)
6. Students' learning of the subject	1	60 (56%)	97 (86%)
	2	46 (42%)	13 (12%)	24.619225	< 0.001 *
	3	2 (2 %)	3 (2%)
7. General evaluation of the subject	1	80 (74%)	100 (89%)
	2	25 (23%)	10 (9%)	7.6007955	< 0.05 *
	3	3 (3 %)	3 (2%)

Ratings: 1 – Good and very good 2 – Regular 3 – Weak and very weak