Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 3;27:22. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0016-z

Table 3.

Frequency of critical error with devices (quantitative and qualitative estimates)

Device Cross-sectional studies RCTs
Number of studies Pooled estimate [95% CI] (I-squared)* Range of error frequency Number of studies Pooled estimate [95% CI] (I-squared)* Range of error frequency
MDI 10 45.6% [26.0–66.6] (98.4%) 12.0–93.0% 0 N/A N/A
MDI with spacer 3 8.9% [0.9–50.5] (93.7%) 2.6–47.0% 0 N/A N/A
BA-MDI (Autohaler®) 1 N/A 11.0% 0 N/A N/A
Turbuhaler® 10 40.1% [28.6–52.9] (95.7%) 18.0–100% 1 N/A 26.0%
Diskus® 9 20.8% [13.7–30.2] (93.6%) 6.8–43.0% 3 18.0% [8.2–35.1] (84.2%) 8.0–31.9%
Aerolizer® 4 14.2% [11.0–18.1] (44.3%) 9.1–16.8% 0 N/A N/A
Handihaler® 3 42.4% [28.8–57.1] (58.4%) 35.0–53.1% 0 N/A N/A

N/A Not applicable

* I-squared statistic indicates the percentage of variance that is attributable to between-study heterogeneity. The higher the percentage, the greater the heterogeneity. Not applicable as number of studies was ≤1