Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;88(3):812–827. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12615

Table 4.

Hierarchical Logistic Regression Predicting Which Children Achieved a Good Level of Development on the EYFSP in Reception Year (n = 7,260)

Variable b SE Wald p Odds ratio (95% CI)
Unadjusted model
EAL 0.25 .20 1.59 .207 1.28 (0.87, 1.89)
CCC–S score −0.20 .01 1,420.33 < .001 0.82 (0.81, 0.83)
CCC–S × EAL 0.02 .01 1.28 .258 1.02 (0.99, 1.04)
Constant 2.01 .05 1,508.96 < .001
Adjusted model
EAL 0.24 .20 1.48 .223 1.28 (0.86, 1.89)
CCC–S score −0.19 .01 1,256.44 < .001 0.83 (0.82, 0.84)
CCC–S × EAL 0.01 .01 0.77 .381 1.01 (0.98, 1.04)
Male sex −0.56 .06 89.58 < .001 0.57 (0.51, 0.64)
Age in months 0.07 .01 68.00 < .001 1.07 (1.06, 1.09)
IDACI rank < 0.01 < .01 4.84 .028 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
Constant −2.46 .56 19.45 < .001

EYFSP = Early Years Foundation Stage Profile; EAL = English as an additional language; CCC–S = Children's Communication Checklist–Short; IDACI = Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index.