Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 24;37(5):621–640. doi: 10.1002/jat.3412

Table 4.

Comparison of model predictions in blood with observed data using Sum of Square Error (SSE)

Study SSEa Ratio of SSE for current model compared with Salazar et al. (2015)b
ETBE‐TBA model presented Salazar et al. (2015)
TBA IV (Poet et al., 1997) 1.24E + 06 3.89E + 06 0.3
TBA inhalation (Leavens & Borghoff, 2009); includes both single and repeat 7.14E + 04 7.74E + 04 0.9
TBA gavage (ARCO, 1983; unpublished report); blood 3.71E + 05 1.36E + 05 2.7
TBA gavage (ARCO, 1983; unpublished report); urinary excretion percentage 5.27E + 03 8.26E + 03 0.6
TBA blood concentrations following ETBE gavage (JPEC, 2008b; single) 6.42E + 01 2.17E + 03 0.03
TBA blood concentrations following ETBE gavage (JPEC, 2008c; repeated) 3.17E+00c 2.3E+00c 1.4
TBA cumulative in urine following ETBE gavage (JPEC, 2008b; single) 2.22E + 01 1.13E‐01d 2.0E2
Percentage dose exhaled versus excreted following ETBE gavage (JPEC, 2008b; single) 9.94E + 01 2.85E + 04 0.004
ETBE blood concentrations following ETBE inhalation study (Amberg et al., 2000) 1.25E + 00 3.45E‐01 3.6
TBA blood concentrations following ETBE inhalation study (Amberg et al., 2000) 7.11E‐01 3.40E + 00 0.2
Percentage dose excreted following ETBE inhalation study (Amberg et al., 2000) 2.41E + 01 1.45E + 02 0.2
Cumulative TBA in urine following ETBE inhalation study (Amberg et al., 2000) 7.65E‐05 8.22E‐03 0.01

ETBE, ethyl tertiary‐butyl ether; TBA, tertiary‐butyl alcohol.

a

Estimated from square of difference between predicted value and observed data for study.

b

Ratios less than one indicate a better prediction of data with current model and are shaded for emphasis.

c

Fits for both models are improved if no induction is assumed for TBA metabolism.

d

Note that the TBA urine was closer to the measured because of lower urinary elimination, which results in TBA blood concentrations with a larger discrepancy compared to measured values.