Table 3.

Risk of Death, Rehospitalization, or Emergency Room Visit with IRF and WRF at 72 H Compared With Patients With Stable RF

	Unadjusted		Adjusted for Baseline eGFR		Adjusted for Baseline Characteristics		Adjusted for Baseline and In-Hospital Characteristics
	HR 95% CI	P	HR (95% CI)	P	HR (95% CI)	P	HR (95% CI)	P
IRF and WRF defined using a >0.3 absolute change in creatinine
IRF	2.52 (1.57–4.03)	<.001*	2.21 (1.35–3.61)	.002*	2.21 (1.34–3.68)	.002*	2.19 (1.32–3.64)	.003*
WRF	1.17 (0.77–1.78)	.47	1.18 (0.78–1.79)	.44	1.36 (0.85–2.18)	.20	1.34 (0.83–2.15)	.23
IRF and WRF defined using a ≥20% change in eGFR
IRF	2.47 (1.57–3.92)	< .001*	2.25 (1.41–3.60)	.001*	2.01 (1.22–3.33)	.007*	2.08 (1.27–3.41)	.003*
WRF	1.30 (0.83–2.03)	.26	1.45 (0.91–2.31)	.11	1.47 (0.88–2.45)	.14	1.28 (0.77–2.13)	.34

Patients were divided into 3 renal function groups: WRF, IRF, and Stable RF. Hazard ratios are presented for WRF compared with Stable RF and IRF compared with Stable RF.

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. Other abbreviations as in Table 1.

^*Significant P value.