Skip to main content
. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0176622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176622

Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.

Study Participants NIHSS Stroke Time hours Reference Standard CT scanner Coverage mm Thickness mm Color maps Design
Campbell 2012[11] 364 10(5–18) 277(76%) 9(3.1) Follow up CT/MRI Siemens 16 slice 24 12 TTP, CBV, CBF Retrospective
Chen 2012[12] 20 NS 20(100%) 20(NS) Follow up MRI Toshiba 320 slice 160 0.5 CBV, CBF,MTT, TTP Prospective
Dai 2009[13] 23 NS 23(100%) NS Follow up MRI Siemens 64 slice 28.8 7.2 CBV, CBF, TTP Retrospective
Eastwood 2003[14] 15 12.6 14(93%) 8(3.1) Follow up MRI GE 1 slice 5–10 5–10 CBV, CBF, MTT Prospective
Eckert 2010[15] 107 8.3 76(71%) 6(NS) Follow up CT/MRI Philips 40 slice 40 10 CBV, MTT Prospective
Eseban 2004[16] 42 NS 29(69%) 6(NS) Follow up CT/MRI GE 16 slice 20 5–10 CBV, CBF, MTT Retrospective
Hana 2014[17] 87 NS 87(100%) NS Follow up MRI GE 64 slice NS NS CBV, CBF, MTT Retrospective
Kloska2004[18] 41 10.5 38(93%) 8(3.1) Follow up CT/MRI Siemens 4 slice 20 10 TTP, CBV, CBF Prospective
Koenig 1998[19] 32 NS 28(88%) 6(2.7) Follow up CT/MRI Siemens slip-ring 10 10 CBF Prospective
Langer 2007[20] 50 6(0–28) 38(76%) 8(NS) Follow up CT GE multi slice NS NS CBV, CBF, MTT Prospective
Leng 2003[21] 46 NS 34(74%) 6(NS) Follow up CT Maconi multi slice NS 20 CBF, TTP, MTT NS
Lin 2009[22] 100 12(4–8)* 65(65%) 3(NS) Follow up MRI Siemens16 slice 24 12 TTP, CBV, CBF Retrospective
Liu 2005[23] 31 NS 31(100%) 24(NS) Follow up CT/MRI 8 slice NS NS CBV, CBF, MTT NS
Pepper 2006[24] 15 15(11–20) 14(93%) 6(4.1) Follow up CT/MRI Philips 16-slice 24 6 CBV, CBF,MTT Prospective
Rai2008[25] 422 NS 157(37%) 15(3.9) Follow up MRI GE multi slice 20 10 CBV, CBF, MTT Retrospective
Reichenbach 1999[26] 20 NS 20(100%) 6(2.8) Follow up CT/MRI Siemens slip-ring 10 10 TTP Prospective
Roberts 2001[27] 12 NS 9(75%) 6(NS) Follow up CT/MRI GE multi slice 40 10 TTP, CBV, CBF, MTT NS
Rother2000[28] 22 13.2 20(91%) 6(2.4) Follow up CT Siemens slip-ring 10 10 TTP Prospective
Schramm 2004[29] 22 10(4–8) 13(59%) 6(2.3) Follow up CT Siemens multi slice 20 10 TTP, CBV, CBF Prospective
Sillanpaa 2011[30] 72 7(4–2) 72(100%) 3(NS) Follow up CT GE 16 slice, Philips 64 slice 80 or 20 10 or 5 CBV, CBF, MTT Retrospective
Suzuki 2005[31] 118 NS 110(93%) 10(NS) Follow up CT/MRI GE 64 slice 30 10 CBV, CBF, MTT NS
Wintermark 2005[32] 46 NS 26(57%) 12(5.5) Follow up CT/MRI Philips multi slice 40 10 TTP, CBV, CBF, MTT Retrospective
Youn2008[33] 58 NS 51(88%) 24(3.4) Follow up MRI Philips 64 slice 80 10 TTP, CBV, CBF, MTT Retrospective
Zebedin2011[34] 10 NS 2(20%) 9(NS) Follow up CT Toshiba 320-MDCT 5 5 CBV, CBF, MTT Retrospective
Zhu2011[35] 38 NS 38(100%) 6(NS) DWI Philips 64 slice 40 5 CBV, TTP NS
Sporns2016 [36] 267 4 (4.6–5.3) * 188(70%) 0–9 Follow up MRI 128-slice Siemens dual-source CT 99 5 CBV, CBF,MTT, TTD Retrospective
van der Hoeven2015[37] 88 2.5 (2–5)* 76(86%) 3.8(2.6) Follow up CT/MRI 40–320 detector C T(Philips,Siemens, GE, Toshiba) >40 5 CBF, CBV, MTT Prospective

* median (IQR)