Figure 7.

Regression analysis on experimental versus inTherAcc-(top), inTher-(center) and IntaRNA-(bottom) predicted hybridization efficacy for (A) 2-MS2 and (B) gII intron. inTherAcc exhibits superior performance in predicting hybridization potential in (A) 2-MS2 and (B) group II intron compared to both inTher and IntaRNA models when considering linear regression fits. (B) Higher performance accuracy of hybridization efficacy in gII intron is achieved by inTherAcc due to its capability to predict extreme lows and highs. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Both predicted and experimental hybridization efficacies were linearly scaled from 0 to 1.