Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ind Med. 2017 Mar;60(3):295–305. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22693

Table V.

Ergonomic Solutions Ratings

Ergonomic Solutions (N=16) Locus of Control Adoption Solution matrix group Criterion for Adoption
Total facilitator count Total barrier count
Relative Advantage* Usability Compatibility* Complexity Trialability* Observability**
Always Adopted (n=2)
 Power crimper C A II + 6 0 + + + 6 0
 Pry bar – extended W A II + 6 0 + + + 6 0
Intermittently Adopted (n=10)
 Grout sponge roller basin W I II + 0 0 + + + 6 0
 Electric carpet puller C I II + 6 0 + + + 6 0
 Carpet puller – manual W I II + 6 0 + + + 6 0
 Positioners for work tasks W I I/II + 6 2 + / − + + 6 2
 Overhead drill press C I II + / − 6 2 + + + 6 2
 Various rolling carts C I IV + / − 6 3 + / − + + 6 3
 Power shears / snips C I II + 5 1 + + + 5 1
 Custom fit knee & shin pads W I I + 5 1 + + 5 1
 Ride-on scraper C I II + 4 2 + + 4 2
 Vibration dampening gloves W I I + 4 2 + + 4 2
Rarely Adopted (n=2)
 Knee pad with body support W R II + / − 4 3 + + 4 3
 3D Laser Scanning C R III + / − 3 5 + 3 5
Not Adopted (n=2)
 Stand up trowel W N II + / − 4 4 + + 4 4
 Rolling chest support W N II 2 4 + 2 4

+ = Facilitators, − = Barriers, W=Worker, C=Contractor, A=Always used, I=Intermittently used, R=Rarely used, N=Not used

*

chi-square test, p<0.05,

**

no test of association