Skip to main content
. 2017 May 18;2(10):e88609. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.88609

Figure 5. Effect of brain injury on neurodevelopment in the mouse neocortex.

Figure 5

(A) Schematic representation of the procedure for producing the mouse model of brain injury. (B) Representative photograph of maternal uterine arteries occluded with 4 disposable vascular clips. (C) Brains of control embryos (left) and occluded embryos (middle and right) 12 hours after occlusion. Sections were immunostained with anti-PH3 antibody (counterstained with DAPI). SVZ, subventricular zone; VZ, ventricular zone. Scale bar: 100 μm. (D) The numbers of PH3-positive cells in the VZ and SVZ are shown (control: n = 18, moderate: n = 19, severe: n = 6). A Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test was used. **P < 0.01. (E) After transfection of GFP expression plasmid at E15.0, a sham operation (Control) or maternal uterine artery occlusion (Occluded) was performed at E16.5. Brains were analyzed at P1 (counterstained with DAPI [blue]). MZ, marginal zone; CP, cortical plate. Scale bar: 100 μm. (F) Cell distribution was evaluated by bin analysis. Data obtained in 5 control brains and 6 occluded brains (mean ± SEM) are shown. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. (G) Relative migration distances (%) from the ventricle. Average relative migration distances in 5 control brains and 6 occluded brains are shown. **P < 0.01, Student’s t test. (D and G) Each point represents an individual mouse. Box-and-whisker plots were used to graphically represent the median (line within box), upper and lower quartiles (bounds of box), and maximum and minimum values (top and bottom bars).