Skip to main content
. 2017 May 16;5:e3323. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3323

Table 3. Proportion of various types of papers in our selected journals.

Categorisations are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. Journals are referred by the labels assigned in Table 1. “Rub.” refers to the rubrics in Table 2. The online Supplemental Information 1 indicates which papers belong to each of the numbers in this table.

Journal Number of papers (rub. 1–12) Number of papers with regression (rub. 4–12) Dealing with assumptions No regression
Correctly (rub. 4) Unclear (rub. 5–7) Incorrectly (rub. 8–12) Correct (violation of true assumption) (rub. 2) Incorrect (violation of false assumption) (rub. 3)
Q1.1 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q1.2 86 6 (7%) 0 6 (100%) 0 0 0
Q1.3 98 26 (28%) 0 25 (100%) 0 3 (100%) 0
Q2.1 227 44 (19%) 3 (7%) 39 (89%) 2 (5%) 1 (100%) 0
Q2.2 199 52 (26%) 0 49 (94%) 3 (6%) 0 0
Q2.3 54 14 (26%) 0 14(100%) 0 0 0
Q3.1 23 5 (22%) 0 5 (100%) 0 1 (50%) 1 (50%)
Q3.2 59 21 (55%) 0 16 (71%) 5 (29%) 1 (100%) 0
Q3.3a 10a 2 (20%)a 0a 2 (100%)a 0a 0a 0a
Q4.1 2 1 (50%) 0 1 (100%) 0 0 0
Q4.2 82 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q4.3 20 2 (10%) 0 2 (100%) 0 0 0
Total 893 172 (19 %) 3 (2%) 159 (92%) 10 (6%) 6 (86%) 1 (14%)

Notes.

a

Papers in Spanish excluded.