Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016 Jun 2;67:95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.06.003

Table 4.

Behavior problems and long-term performance of academic achievement by gender.

Variables Externalizing behaviors
Internalizing behaviors
AP score
LW score
PC score
AP score
LW score
PC score
b (95% CI) b (95% CI) b (95% CI) b (95% CI) b (95% CI) b (95% CI)
Behavior problems * male 0.02 (−0.18, 0.23) 0.25* (0.02, 0.48) 0.20 (−0.02, 0.42) −0.06 (−0.38, 0.27) 0.31 (−0.09,0.70) 0.15 (−0.19, 0.50)
Behavior problems * age * male 0.00 (−0.01,0.01) −0.00 (−0.01,0.01) −0.01 (−0.02,0.01) −0.00 (−0.01,0.01) −0.00 (−0.02, 0.01) −0.00 (−0.02, 0.01)
Number of children 2028 2028 1960 2028 2028 1960
Number of observations 4119 4119 3.591 4119 4119 3.591

a. All three models are adjusted for the following covariates: (1) children’s race, gender, preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care, and physical/mental limitation; (2) mother’s age, education, employment status, parental warmth, emotional support, and cognitive stimulation; and (3) household’s size, number of children, food stamp participation, Aid to Families with Dependent Children or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families participation, homeownership, household income, and state fixed effects. b. The analysis on the PC score has a smaller sample size since only children aged 6 or older can take this test.

*

p < 0.05.