Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Urban Stud. 2015 Oct 20;53(15):3279–3295. doi: 10.1177/0042098015608058

Table 3.

Comparisons of alternative spatial weight specifications with spatial lag model.

Crime Spatial
weights
matrix
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

No
cut-off
1/8 mile
cut-off
1/4 mile
cut-off
2 mile
cut-off
4 mile
cut-off
6 mile
cut-off
Same
tracts
Felony assault AIC 115,953 71,267 71,343 10,7735 115,302 115,949 120,376
BIC 116,119 71,433 71,509 107,902 115,469 116,115 120,542
Burglary AIC 65,822 16,433 17,889 53,648 62,200 65,779 66,393
BIC 65,988 16,599 18,055 53,814 62,366 65,946 66,559
Robbery AIC 121,202 57,970 60,336 106,464 112,023 112,054 115,988
BIC 121,368 58,137 60,502 106,630 112,189 112,220 116,154
Theft AIC 36,515 −20,897 −20,738 30,340 35,589 36,438 41,222
BIC 36,681 −20,731 −20,572 30,506 35,756 36,604 41,388
Motor vehicle
theft
AIC 126,086 76,849 73,657 112,654 121,692 126,054 121,013
BIC 126,252 77,016 73,823 112,820 121,858 126,221 121,179