Skip to main content
. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177807

Table 1. Infectious status of malaria vectors and dominant contribution of Anopheles funestus mosquitoes to ongoing malaria transmission, despite their low abundance relative to Anopheles arabiensis.

Anopheles arabiensis Anopheles funestus s.l
Total number of mosquitoes collected by CDC Light Trap (January 2015 to January 2016) 20135 4759
Total number of trap nights 1152 1152
Biting rate per night 17.48 4.13
Relative efficiency (CDC-LT) relative to HLC (Derived from Okumu et al 2008 [38]) 0.3 0.68
Corrected biting rate 58.26 6.08
Total number of mosquitoes analysed for Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein (CSP) 20135 4759
Total number of sporozoite positive mosquitoes 4 25
Sporozoite rate 0.0002 0.0053
Annual EIR (Adjusted)** 4.22 11.65
% EIR Contribution (Adjusted)** 26.61% 73.39%
Annual EIR (not adjusted) 1.27 7.92
% EIR Contribution (not adjusted) 13.79% 86.21%

• Annual EIR (Corrected biting rate x Sporozoite rate x 365)

• Overall EIR (EIR for An. arabiensis+ EIR for An. funestus) = 18.45

• *86.3% of the mosquitoes from the An. funestus group tested were An. funestus s.s, 8.4% were An. leesoni and 5.2% were An. rivulorum. Of all An. funestus s.l mosquitoes that tested positive for malaria parasites, 96% were An. funestus s.s, the remaining 4% being An. rivulorum.

• **Where the estimates are adjusted, these adjustments were done using coefficients computed as the ratio of mosquito catches by CDC-Light Traps to catches Human Landing Catch methods. These coefficients were 0.3 for An. arabiensis and 0.68 for An. funestus as determined by Okumu et al 2008 [35]