Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 15;19(4):341–350. doi: 10.1017/thg.2016.46

Table 5.

Bivariate analyses for IHS MO/MA and MDD with and without sex-limitation

Disorders Total sample Sex-limitation

Female Male

A C E A C E A C E
IHS MO/MA 0.53 (0.35–0.72) 0.29 (0.13–0.44) 0.18 (0.13–0.24) 0.60 (0.39–0.80) 0.23 (0.054–0.41) 0.16 (0.11–0.23) 0.32 (0.040–0.70) 0.36 (0.056–0.62) 0.32 (0.19–0.48)
MDD 0.52 (0.44–0.59) 0.48 (0.41–0.56) 0.56 (0.46–0.65) 0.44 (0.35–0.50) 0.42 (0.27–0.56) 0.58 (0.44–0.73)
Bivariate variance 0.13 (0.070–0.25) 2.0×10−4 (8.6×10−11–0.018) 0.094 (0.038–0.20) 0.016 (5.7×10−7–0.074) 0.13 (0.020–0.52) 0.047 (1.6×10−6–0.18)
Correlation 0.51 (0.37–0.69) −0.020 (−0.19–0.15) 0.41 (0.26–0.60) −0.19 (−0.41–0.036) 0.56 (0.19–1) 0.29 (−8.5×10−4–0.56)

A: additive genetic factors; C: non-unique environmental factors E: unique environmental factors.