Skip to main content
. 2017 May 19;11:267. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00267

Table 2.

Results of the estimation accuracy using paired t-tests for Experiment 1.

Data with different quality CNR = 0.5 CNR = 0.6 CNR = 0.7 CNR = 0.8 CNR = 0.9 CNR = 1.0 CNR = 2
p-value in spatial accuracy 5.43e-05 1.16e-06 3.05e-06 7.96e-03 1.42e-07 2.79e-06 1.77e-07
t-value in spatial accuracy −7.14 −11.44 −10.19 −3.39 −14.61 −10.30 −14.24
p-value in temporal accuracy 0.61 0.002 4.34e-05 0.98 3.12e-05 6.20e-06 7.14e-06
t-value in temporal accuracy 0.52 −4.12 −7.35 0.014 −7.66 −9.36 −9.20
Data with different quantity Number of time points = 40 Number of time points = 60 Number of time points = 80 Number of time points = 100 Number of time points = 120
p-value in spatial accuracy 2.21e-05 2.01e-06 9.17e-07 4.71e-07 2.98e-07
t-value in spatial accuracy −8.00 −10.71 −11.76 −12.71 −13.41
p-value in temporal accuracy 3.74e-03 2.0e-3 1.58e-3 8.52e-05 5.64e-05
t-value in temporal accuracy −3.88 −6.01 −6.21 −6.73 −7.10