Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 1;402(4):591–598. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1571-z

Table 2.

Participants’ surgical characteristics

Characteristic TachoSil N = 54 TachoComb N = 54
Method of liver resection, n (%)
 CUSA 44 (81.5) 42 (77.8)
 Drip bipolar 8 (14.8) 11 (20.4)
 Harmonic scalpel 9 (16.7) 9 (16.7)
 Clamp crush 7 (13.0) 4 (7.4)
 Bipolar scissors 4 (7.4) 5 (9.3)
 Other 20 (37.0) 15 (27.8)
Number of resection sites, mean ± SD 2.6 ± 1.40 3.1 ± 1.5
Weight of liver resected (g), mean ± SD 315.3 ± 274.2 338.4 ± 302.1
Intraoperative blood transfusion, n (%)
 Before efficacy evaluation 0 (0) 3 (5.6)
 After efficacy evaluation 12 (22.2) 8 (14.8)
Blood flow occlusion, n (%) 47 (87.0) 49 (90.7)
Method of primary hemostasis, n (%)
 Suture 18 (33.3) 18 (33.3)
 Ligation 13 (24.1) 17 (31.5)
 Electrocoagulation 43 (79.6) 45 (83.3)
 Compression 23 (42.6) 19 (35.2)
Volume of bleeding (mL), mean ± SD 649.5 ± 932.2 666.3 ± 499.0
Size of patch used, n (%)
 9.5 × 4.8 cm 9 (16.7) 11 (20.4)
 4.8 × 4.8 cm 5 (9.3) 1 (1.9)
 2.4 × 4.8 cm 6 (11.1) 4 (7.4)
 2.4 × 2.4 cm 21 (38.9) 27 (50.0)
 Other 13 (24.1) 11 (20.4)

CUSA Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator, SD standard deviation