Table 2. Variance partitioning of the AMF community matrix with the plant community also included as a predictor of the AMF community.
Source of variance |
Phylogeny |
Presence/absence |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Root | Soil | Root | Soil | |
Environment | 0NS | 0NS | 3*** | 0NS |
Space | 30*** | 29*** | 19*** | 24*** |
Plants | 0NS | 0NS | 4** | 0NS |
Env+space | 4NT | 3NT | 11NT | 5NT |
Space+plants | 0NT | 6NT | 11NT | 10NT |
Env+plants | 0NT | 0NT | 0NT | 0NT |
Env+space+plants | 3NT | 3NT | 0NT | 2NT |
Unexplained | 63 | 59 | 52 | 54 |
Abbreviations: AMF, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; NS, not significant, NT, not testable.
The table is divided in two main blocks: phylogeny and presence/absence of plants. These blocks refer to how the effect of plants on AMF was evaluated. In the first two columns of results (phylogeny, root and soil), the effects of plants (row wise) is assessed by using plant phylogeny as a predictor of AMF. In the second two columns (presence/absence, root and soil), we used plant community structure as predictor of AMF. The other predictors were environment or env (soil properties) and space (geographic position). The plus sign in the Source of variance column stands for shared variation (it is not the sum of the variances explained by each predictor, for example, env+space is the spatially structured effect of the environment). Figures are percentage values of total variance. ***P<0.001; **P<0.01.