Table 1.
Ref. | Yes response | No response | Partiel reported/ unclear | Assessment |
Fattovich et al[21] | 16 | 2 | 0 | High-quality |
Diago et al[7] | 15 | 2 | 1 | High-quality |
Apolinario et al[9] | 14 | 2 | 2 | High-quality |
Darling et al[31] | 14 | 1 | 3 | High-quality |
Lagging et al[34] | 14 | 3 | 1 | High-quality |
Al-Ashgar[19] | 13 | 3 | 2 | Low-quality |
Derbala et al[32] | 13 | 2 | 3 | Low-quality |
Kurelac et al[33] | 12 | 3 | 3 | Low-quality |
Studies was ranked as high quality if the provided ≥ 14 “yes” answers, or low quality if they provided ≤ 13 “yes” answers.