Skip to main content
. 2017 May 18;9(14):677–688. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i14.677

Table 4.

Genotype and liver fibrosis stage for the 8 included studies

Ref. Genotype (n)
Method Liver fibrosis stage
1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Apolinario et al[9] 43 20 Scheuer score 28 35
Lagging et al[34]4 1701 231 491 111 Ishak score 11 61 65 30 15 20 14
IL28B rs12979860 CC 44 13 33 3 3 18 27 11 5 12 5
IL28B rs12979860 CT 96 7 15 5 7 35 27 17 7 6 6
IL28B rs12979860 TT 30 3 1 3 1 8 11 2 3 2 3
Diago et al[7] 103 9 25 Ishak score 106 31
Fattovich et al[21] 92 87 47 Metavir2 121 21
Kurelac et al[33] 46 Ishak 34 12
Darling et al[31] 272 Ishak 220 52
Darbala et al[32] 159 Scheuer score 109 50
Ashgar et al[19] 64 Metavir 343 10 3
1

Baseline information for the sub analysis of IL28 12979860. Two hundred and fifty-two patients are reported to be enrolled, however adding the genotypes yields 253 patients. Likevise biopsies from 228 patients are described, however when adding the Ishak scores only yields 216 patients;

2

Biopsies only available for 142 patients;

3

Histology available for 44 patients;

4

Lagging et al provided baseline demographics in accordance with IL-28 genotype (only baseline characteristics for rs12979860 are reported in the review, as these were representative for the study population). A box stretching over two - or more genotypes or fibrosis stage, indicates that the number refers to the combined group.