Table 3.
Accelerometer data (proportions of time spent in physical activity, sedentary and stationary + categories; n = 19) and workday dietary choices (n = 17) at baseline, end-program and follow-up
| Baseline | End-program | Follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accelerometers (%) | |||
| Work time | |||
| Physical activity | 9 (3) | 10 (5) | 10 (5) |
| Sedentary | 23 (16) | 17 (6) | 14 (5) |
| Stationary+ | 68 (16) | 73 (7) | 76 (7) |
| Workday non-work time (24 h – work time) | |||
| Physical activity | 5 (3) | 6 (3) | 5 (3) |
| Sedentary1 | 63 (15) | 68 (9) | 72 (8) |
| Stationary +2 | 32 (13) | 26 (7) | 23 (7) |
| Non-workday (24 h) | |||
| Physical activity | 7 (2) | 8 (3) | 7 (3) |
| Sedentary | 62 (8) | 65 (9) | 66 (9) |
| Stationary+ | 31 (7) | 29 (8) | 29 (8) |
| Workday dietary scores | |||
| Mean (SD) fruit serves/day3 | 4 (1) | 5 (1) | 4 (1) |
| 2+ fruit serves/day (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Mean (SD) veg. Serves/day4 | 4 (2) | 5 (2) | 4 (2) |
| 6+ veg serves/day (%) | 29 | 41 | 24 |
| Mean (SD) saturated fat score (0–90) | 50 (9) | 56 (12) | 56 (13) |
| Mean (SD) processed sugar score (0–69) | 42 (7) | 43 (6) | 43 (7) |
SD standard deviation
Workday non-work time: 1Sedentary baseline vs follow-up (p = 0.007); 2Stationary + baseline vs end-program (p = 0.037) and follow-up (p < 0.033)
Fruit and veg serves/day: Baseline vs end-program3 (p = 0.023) and 4(p = 0.024)