Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomol NMR. 2016 Nov 19;68(2):101–118. doi: 10.1007/s10858-016-0072-7

Table 1.

RMSD in SMILE peak position, width, and height, as well as the average height deviation relative to the noise-free, fully sampled reference dataa

Peak Relative
height
Fully
sampledb
Randomc T2
weightedc
Sine-weigthed poisson gapc

θ: 0–π/2 θ: 0–π no wt
RMSD in peak position (Hz)
  1 1.0 0.720 0.753 0.984 2.236 1.051 0.809
  2 1.6 0.418 0.488 0.615 1.798 0.613 0.542
  3d 2.7 2.491 0.535 1.059 2.083 1.233 0.891
  4 4.3 0.163 0.203 0.306 0.868 0.263 0.252
  5 7.0 0.109 0.140 0.200 0.558 0.171 0.166
  6 11.4 0.074 0.095 0.128 0.325 0.117 0.112
  7 18.6 0.052 0.067 0.090 0.223 0.069 0.084
  8 30.2 0.048 0.054 0.072 0.166 0.053 0.058
  9 49.2 0.043 0.049 0.065 0.134 0.040 0.051
  10 80.0 0.008 0.032 0.061 0.102 0.029 0.037

RMSD in peak width (Hz)
  1 1.0 0.915 1.024 1.096 1.162 0.940 1.091
  2 1.6 0.534 0.742 0.876 1.129 0.664 0.801
  3d 2.7 1.378 0.737 1.856 2.519 2.110 1.125
  4 4.3 0.197 0.418 0.531 0.879 0.310 0.468
  5 7.0 0.128 0.311 0.420 0.717 0.209 0.341
  6 11.4 0.075 0.227 0.313 0.506 0.140 0.253
  7 18.6 0.046 0.159 0.235 0.409 0.093 0.178
  8 30.2 0.029 0.123 0.165 0.300 0.074 0.126
  9 49.2 0.018 0.100 0.145 0.216 0.052 0.118
  10 80.0 0.011 0.089 0.159 0.176 0.048 0.109

RMSD in peak height relative to reference height (%)
  1 1.0 14.0 16.9 18.7 33.1 18.2 17.5
  2 1.6 9.1 13.6 14.2 26.1 14.3 14.0
  3d 2.7 5.3 7.2 7.5 12.3 11.4 6.8
  4 4.3 3.5 5.8 7.0 15.4 7.4 6.3
  5 7.0 2.1 3.8 5.1 11.7 4.9 4.0
  6 11.4 1.3 2.5 3.5 8.2 3.1 2.9
  7 18.6 0.8 1.6 2.5 6.3 2.2 1.7
  8 30.2 0.5 1.2 1.9 4.6 1.5 1.2
  9 49.2 0.5 0.9 1.6 3.2 1.1 1.1
  10 80.0 0.2 0.6 1.1 2.0 0.6 0.7

Average deviation in peak height relative to reference height (%)
  1 1.0 2.5 −3.3 −1.1 17.0 −1.3 −4.0
  2 1.6 0.3 −4.5 −3.7 6.8 −3.9 −4.8
  3d 2.7 −0.3 −1.1 −1.9 −3.9 −6.1 −1.7
  4 4.3 −0.2 −2.0 −2.1 −2.4 −3.0 −2.1
  5 7.0 0.1 −1.5 −1.7 −3.8 −2.4 −1.1
  6 11.4 0.1 −1.0 −1.1 −3.7 −1.5 −0.8
  7 18.6 −0.2 −0.6 −0.7 −3.0 −1.1 −0.3
  8 30.2 0.0 −0.2 −0.3 −1.7 −0.8 −0.1
  9 49.2 −0.4 −0.0 0.0 −0.8 −0.5 0.1
  10 80.0 0.0 −0.0 0.0 −0.0 −0.0 0.0

Missing peaks 0.1% 0.7% 0.5% 1.4% 0.9% 1.0%
a

The time domain input data can be downloaded from http://spin.niddk.nih.gov/bax/software/SMILE, and all the scripts used for the simulation and reconstructions are included as Supplementary Material

b

Simulated fully sampled data set (t1 = 94.8 ms) with the peak intensity scaled down by √10 and the deviations calculated from the data sets with and without the RMS noise added

c

Compared to the 142.2 ms (50% longer t1) fully sampled noise-free data to match the 50% extended acquisition time in the F1 dimension of the final SMILE spectra. Poisson gap sampling schemes as defined by (Hyberts et al. 2010). T2-weighted exponential sampling scheme using the NUS sampler provided in MddNMR (Orekhov and Jaravine 2011)

d

This peak was always placed 23 Hz away from the strongest peak (#10)