Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 8;330(7482):68. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38336.804167.47

Table 3.

Best multiple-term strategies maximising precision. Values are percentages (95% confidence intervals)

Search strategy in Ovid format Sensitivity* Specificity** Precision
Top precision performer
Medline.tw. or systematic review.tw. or meta-analysis.pt.
Development 75.2 (67.0 to 82.3) 99.4 (99.2 to 99.5) 60.2 (52.4 to 67.7)
Validation without CDSR 74.4 (69.7 to 79.1) 98.6 (98.5 to 98.7) 26.3 (23.5 to 29.1)
Validation 71.2 (68.0 to 74.4) 99.2 (99.1 to 99.3) 57.1 (53.9 to 60.3)
Combining most precise term with most sensitive terms (seetable 1)§

Cochrane database of systematic reviews.jn. or search.tw. or meta-analysis.pt. or Medline.tw. or systematic review.tw. 90.2 (88.1 to 92.3) 98.4 (98.3 to 98.5) 46.5 (43.9 to 49.0)
Cochrane database of systematic reviews.jn. or search:.tw. 79.0 (76.1 to 81.9) 98.8 (98.8 to 98.9) 51.8 (48.9 to 54.7)
Cochrane database of systematic reviews.jn. or Medline.tw. 74.4 (71.3 to 77.5) 99.5 (99.4 to 99.5) 68.8 (65.6 to 72.0)

CDSR=Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

*

Development dataset (n=133); validation dataset without CDSR (n=332); validation dataset (n=753).

**

Development dataset (n=10 313); validation dataset without CDSR (n=48 258); validation dataset (n=48 275).

Numbers vary by row.

Keeping sensitivity ≥75%.

§

Reported for the complete validation dataset. The term for the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane database of systematic reviews.jn.) does not apply to the development or to the validation dataset without CDSR since it does not include records from that source.