Abstract
We aim to evaluate the prognostic effect of the histological sub-type in patients with metastatic bladder cancer based on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. A total of 2634 eligible patients were included. The histological subtypes were: transitional cell carcinoma (TCC; 75.2%); adenocarcinoma (3.3%); squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC; 4.1%); and small cell carcinoma (4.3%). A significant association of adenocarcinoma with better survival outcomes (P < 0.015), and that of SQCC with worse outcomes (P < 0.001) was observed. On multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with longer and SQCC with shorter survival time as compared to TCC. Overall, 1331 (50.5%) patients had a single metastatic site and 523 (19.9%) had multiple sites involved. Single-site metastasis had a better survival outcome than multiple metastases (P < 0.001). Histological sub-type and presence of multiple metastatic sites are independent predictors of survival time. Prospective, in-depth research is needed to determine optimal therapeutic strategies for different histological subtypes of bladder cancer with different metastatic patterns.
Keywords: urinary bladder neoplasms, histology, distant metastasis, prognosis, survival
INTRODUCTION
Bladder cancer (BC) has the fifth highest incidence among all cancers in the United States; an estimated 76960 new cases of BC and 16390 deaths from BC occurred in 2016 [1]. It is also the 9th most common cancer and the 13th most common cause of death worldwide [2]. Urothelial carcinoma (transitional cell carcinoma, TCC) is the most common histological sub-type of primary BC, which accounts for > 90% of all bladder tumors. Other histological subtypes include squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC), adenocarcinoma (AD), small cell carcinoma (SCC) and some other rare non-epithelial subtypes. Among these, SQCC, AD and SCC account for less than 5%, 2% [3] and 1% [4, 5] of all primary bladder tumors, respectively.
The rare occurrence of non-TCC subtypes precludes large, prospective studies to compare outcomes. Retrospective and cohort analyses remain the primary tools for clinical research. Previous studies of the impact of non-TCC histology on survival have yielded inconsistent results [6–9]. Some have reported no difference in survival between SQCC and TCC [7–9]. However, a multi-institutional retrospective study to assess the impact of non-TCC histology on bladder cancer-specific outcomes in patients treated with radical cystectomy [6] suggested that non-TCC histology portends worse clinical outcomes. This may reflect a greater propensity for locally aggressive disease and distant metastasis, as well as differential response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
Approximately 25% of all TCC patients will have muscle-invasive and metastatic disease. The prevalence of bone metastasis was reported to be 30–40% in patients with metastatic TCC [10] and the presence of distant (lung, liver, bone) metastases were reported to correlate with shortened survival [11–17]. However, the effect of other histological subtypes on clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic BC remains unclear. Thus, we evaluated TCC and three other rare BC histological sub-types in a contemporary, population-based cohort with an emphasis on the metastatic frequency of BC histology and their effect on overall- and cancer-specific survival.
RESULTS
Data pertaining to 2634 patients who had stage M1 BC, and information on specific metastatic site in the period between January 2010 and December 2013, were extracted. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of all patients with metastatic BC, the histological subtypes included TCC (n = 1981 [75.2%]), AD (n = 88 [3.3%]), SQCC (n = 107 [4.1%]) and SCC (n = 114 [4.3%]). A total of 1331 (50.5%) patients had a single metastatic site (bone, brain, liver or lung), while 523 (19.9%) had metastatic lesions at more than one site. In single metastatic BC patients, 575 (43.2%) of them had bone metastasis, 24 (1.8%) with brain metastasis, 280 (21%) with liver metastasis and 452 (34%) with lung metastasis.
Table 1. Clinical features associated with various histological subtypes of bladder cancer patients.
| Variables | Overall Patients | Transitional cell carcinoma | Adenocarcinoma | Squamous cell carcinoma | Small cell carcinoma | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Patients | 2634 | |||||
| Age (n(%)) | < 0.001 | |||||
| ≤ 65 | 836 (31.7%) | 615 (31%) | 47 (53.4%) | 40 (37.4%) | 31 (27.2%) | |
| > 65 | 1798 (68.3%) | 1366 (69%) | 41 (46.6%) | 67 (62.6%) | 83 (72.8%) | |
| Gender (n(%)) | < 0.001 | |||||
| male | 1853 (70.3%) | 1418 (71.6%) | 58 (65.9%) | 52 (48.6%) | 94 (82.5%) | |
| female | 781 (29.7%) | 563 (28.4%) | 30 (34.1%) | 55 (51.4%) | 20 (17.5%) | |
| Race (n(%)) | 0.003 | |||||
| White | 2227 (84.5%) | 1692 (85.5%) | 65 (73.9%) | 85 (79.4%) | 105 (92.1%) | |
| Black | 262 (9.9%) | 185 (9.4%) | 18 (20.5%) | 15 (14%) | 7 (6.1%) | |
| Other | 142 (5.4%) | 101 (5.1%) | 5 (5.7%) | 7 (6.5%) | 2 (1.8%) | |
| Unknown | 3 (0.1%) | |||||
| Marital status (n(%)) | 0.001 | |||||
| Single | 426 (16.2%) | 307 (16.2%) | 27 (30.7%) | 22 (21.8%) | 8 (7.2%) | |
| Married | 1262 (47.9%) | 963 (51%) | 42 (47.7%) | 50 (49.5%) | 71 (64%) | |
| Divorced/Separated | 338 (12.8%) | 260 (13.8%) | 7 (8%) | 9 (8.9%) | 15 (13.5%) | |
| Widowed | 491 (18.6%) | 360 (19%) | 12 (13.6%) | 20 (19.8%) | 17 (15.3%) | |
| Unknown | 117 (4.4%) | |||||
| T stage (n(%)) | < 0.001 | |||||
| T0 + Tx | 585 (22.2%) | 322 (16.3%) | 28 (31.8%) | 21 (19.6%) | 22 (19.3%) | |
| T1 | 385 (14.6%) | 316 (16%) | 10 (11.4%) | 11 (10.3%) | 17 (14.9%) | |
| T2 | 948 (36%) | 813 (41%) | 17 (19.3%) | 25 (23.4%) | 44 (38.6%) | |
| T3 | 227 (8.6%) | 177 (8.9%) | 13 (14.8%) | 7 (6.5%) | 10 (8.8%) | |
| T4 | 489 (18.6%) | 353 (17.8%) | 20 (22.7%) | 43 (40.2%) | 21 (18.4%) | |
| N stage (n(%)) | 0.008 | |||||
| N0 + Nx | 1815 (68.9%) | 1335 (67.4%) | 71 (80.7%) | 64 (59.8%) | 70 (61.4%) | |
| N1 | 245 (9.3%) | 189 (9.5%) | 6 (6.8%) | 18 (16.8%) | 11 (9.6%) | |
| N2 | 439 (16.7%) | 344 (17.4%) | 11 (12.5%) | 17 (15.9%) | 29 (25.4%) | |
| N3 | 135 (5.1%) | 113 (5.7%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (7.5%) | 4 (3.5%) | |
| Grade (n(%)) | < 0.001 | |||||
| G1 | 21 (0.8%) | 12 (0.8%) | 1 (2%) | 7 (9.2%) | 0 (0%) | |
| G2 | 80 (3%) | 49 (3.1%) | 9 (18.4%) | 20 (26.3%) | 0 (0%) | |
| G3 | 657 (24.9%) | 481 (30.3%) | 36 (73.5%) | 37 (48.7%) | 31 (50.8%) | |
| G4 | 1126 (42.7%) | 1045 (65.8%) | 3 (6.1%) | 12 (15.8%) | 30 (49.2%) | |
| Unknown | 750 (28.5%) | |||||
| Surgery (n(%)) | < 0.001 | |||||
| No | 845 (32.1%) | 484 (24.5%) | 41 (46.6%) | 42 (39.3%) | 27 (23.7%) | |
| Yes | 1784 (67.7%) | 1494 (75.5%) | 47 (53.4%) | 65 (60.7%) | 87 (76.3%) | |
| Unknown | 5 (0.2%) | 3 (0.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Radiotherapy (n(%)) | 0.414 | |||||
| No | 2055 (78%) | 1521 (77.5%) | 72 (81.8%) | 87 (82.9%) | 86 (75.4%) | |
| Yes | 553 (21%) | 442 (22.5%) | 16 (18.2%) | 18 (17.1%) | 28 (24.6%) | |
| Unknown | 26 (1%) | |||||
| Distant metastasis (n(%)) | 0.031 | |||||
| Single site (n(%)) | 1331 (50.5%) | 1014 (51.2%) | 41 (46.6%) | 44 (41.1%) | 54 (47.4%) | |
| Only bone | 575 (43.2%) | 468 (46.2%) | 17 (43.6%) | 15 (34.1%) | 22 (40.7%) | 0.358 |
| Only brain | 24 (1.8%) | 20 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0.635 |
| Only liver | 280 (21%) | 179 (17.7%) | 10 (24.4%) | 5 (11.4%) | 29 (53.7%) | < 0.001 |
| Only lung | 452 (34%) | 347 (34.2%) | 14 (34.1%) | 24 (54.5%) | 2 (3.7%) | < 0.001 |
| Multiple sites | 523 (19.9%) | 377 (27.1%) | 15 (26.8%) | 15 (25.4%) | 38 (41.3%) | |
| Unknown | 780 (29.6%) | |||||
| Histology (n(%)) | ||||||
| Transitional cell carcinoma | 1981 (75.2%) | |||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 88 (3.3%) | |||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 107 (4.1%) | |||||
| Small cell carcinoma | 114 (4.3%) | |||||
| Other | 462 (17.5%) |
Median duration of follow-up was 5 months (range, 0 to 47). A total of 2134 (81%) patients died in the group. Kaplan-Meier curves and median OS and CSS were calculated. The median OS and CSS for TCC were 5 and 10 months (range, 0 to 47), respectively; 6 and 25 months (range, 0–47) for AD, 3 and 5 months (range, 0–27) for SQCC and 7 and 11 months (range, 0–43) for SCC, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, the median OS and CSS for AD was significantly higher than that for other histological types (P < 0.015). The median OS and CSS for SQCC were significantly lower than that for the other histological types (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference in median OS and CSS was observed between TCC and SCC (P = 0.877 and 0.686, respectively).
Figure 1.
Overall survival (A) and bladder cancer-specific survival (B) in bladder cancer patients with transitional cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma with distant metastasis.
The median OS and CSS in patients with a single metastatic site was 5 and 9 months (range, 0–47), respectively, while that in patients with more than one metastatic site was 3 and 6 months (range, 0–43), respectively. As shown in Figure 2, the median OS and CSS of patients with multiple metastatic sites was significantly lower than that of patients with a single metastatic site (P < 0.001). Among patients with a single metastatic lesion, the frequency of bone and brain metastasis was almost the same. Lung was the most common site of metastasis in patients with SQCC (54.5%), while it was the least common metastatic site (3.7%) in those with SCC. Liver was the most frequent metastatic site in patients with SCC (53.7%). No brain metastasis was found in patients with AD and SQCC. As shown in Figure 3, a significant difference with respect to liver and lung metastasis was observed between SCC and other histological types (P ≤ 0.004), while a significant difference in lung metastasis was observed between SQCC with TCC and SCC (P < 0.006).
Figure 2.
Overall survival (A) and bladder cancer-specific survival (B) in bladder cancer patients with single metastatic site vs. multiple metastatic sites.
Figure 3. Metastatic frequency in patients with single-site metastatic bladder cancer by histological subtype.
On univariate analysis (Table 2), thirteen variables showed a significant association with OS; these included age (> 65 years old), being widowed, pathological T (T1, T2, T3, T4) and N (N1, N2, N3) stages, history of surgery, presence of multiple metastatic sites, and AD and SQCC histological subtypes. Five variables showed a significant association with CSS (married status, history of surgery, presence of multiple metastatic sites, AD and SQCC histological subtypes). Four variables showed a significant association with both OS and CSS (history of surgery, presence of multiple metastatic sites, AD and SQCC histological subtypes). About 67.7% of all patients had undergone a surgical procedure, which included transurethral resection and partial, simple or radical cystectomy. As 2440 patients (92.6%) with metastatic sites were diagnosed at autopsy, only 78 (3%) patients had undergone surgery at the site of distant metastases. Significantly decreased hazard for OS and CSS was observed in patients who underwent surgery as compared to that in patients who did not undergo surgery (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.660, 0.829, respectively). Presence of multiple metastatic sites was associated with lower OS and CSS (HR: 1.423, 1.537, respectively) than that associated with single site metastasis. Specifically, AD was associated with longer OS and CSS (HR: 0.697, 0.567, respectively) than that associated with the referent TCC. In contrast, SQCC was associated with shorter OS and CSS (HR: 1.504, 1.739, respectively) as compared to TCC.
Table 2. Univariate analysis of overall survival and bladder cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic bladder cancer.
| Variables | Overall survival | Bladder cancer-specific survival | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | P value | Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | P value | |
| Age | ||||||
| ≤ 65 | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| > 65 | 1.339 | 1.220 to 1.469 | < 0.001 | 1.038 | 0.922 to 1.168 | 0.540 |
| Gender | ||||||
| male | 1.000(reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| female | 0.917 | 0.836 to 1.006 | 0.066 | 0.909 | 0.804 to 1.027 | 0.127 |
| Race | ||||||
| White | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Black | 1.076 | 0.935 to 1.240 | 0.307 | 0.995 | 0.820 to 1.207 | 0.960 |
| Other | 0.936 | 0.767 to 1.142 | 0.514 | 0.864 | 0.657 to 1.135 | 0.294 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Married | 0.885 | 0.783 to 1.001 | 0.052 | 0.796 | 0.680 to 0.933 | 0.005 |
| Divorced/Separated | 0.990 | 0.845 to 1.160 | 0.905 | 0.931 | 0.759 to 1.142 | 0.491 |
| Widowed | 1.166 | 1.010 to 1.345 | 0.036 | 0.967 | 0.799 to 1.169 | 0.727 |
| T stage | ||||||
| T0 + Tx | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| T1 | 0.758 | 0.657 to 0.875 | < 0.001 | 0.960 | 0.787 to 1.172 | 0.690 |
| T2 | 0.722 | 0.644 to 0.810 | < 0.001 | 0.985 | 0.839 to 1.157 | 0.855 |
| T3 | 0.667 | 0.562 to 0.790 | < 0.001 | 0.938 | 0.750 to 1.174 | 0.578 |
| T4 | 0.847 | 0.743 to 0.967 | 0.014 | 1.043 | 0.866 to 1.256 | 0.656 |
| N stage | ||||||
| N0 + Nx | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| N1 | 0.801 | 0.685 to 0.937 | 0.005 | 0.913 | 0.747 to 1.115 | 0.371 |
| N2 | 0.853 | 0.759 to 0.959 | 0.008 | 0.958 | 0.824 to 1.114 | 0.579 |
| N3 | 0.753 | 0.617 to 0.919 | 0.005 | 0.869 | 0.675 to 1.119 | 0.277 |
| Grade | ||||||
| G1 | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| G2 | 1.019 | 0.595 to 1.745 | 0.945 | 0.944 | 0.443 to 2.011 | 0.880 |
| G3 | 1.246 | 0.769 to 2.019 | 0.372 | 1.033 | 0.515 to 2.072 | 0.928 |
| G4 | 1.088 | 0.673 to 1.758 | 0.731 | 0.875 | 0.435 to 1.758 | 0.708 |
| Surgery | ||||||
| No | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 0.660 | 0.603 to 0.722 | < 0.001 | 0.829 | 0.732 to 0.939 | 0.003 |
| Radiotherapy | ||||||
| No | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 0.918 | 0.827 to 1.018 | 0.105 | 0.919 | 0.801 to 1.055 | 0.233 |
| Distant metastasis | ||||||
| Single site | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Multiple sites | 1.423 | 1.275 to 1.588 | < 0.001 | 1.537 | 1.331 to 1.774 | < 0.001 |
| Histology | ||||||
| Transitional cell carcinoma | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 0.697 | 0.540 to 0.889 | 0.005 | 0.567 | 0.391 to 0.821 | 0.003 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 1.504 | 1.216 to 1.862 | < 0.001 | 1.739 | 1.335 to 2.265 | < 0.001 |
| Small cell carcinoma | 0.985 | 0.800 to 1.213 | 0.888 | 0.946 | 0.715 to 1.251 | 0.696 |
Variables significantly associated with survival in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis (Table 3). The effect of presence of multiple metastatic sites was further increased after accounting for other covariates (HRs for OS and CSS: 1.428 and 1.605, respectively, versus presence of single metastatic site). Compared with TCC, a lower hazard for OS and CSS was identified in patients with AD (HR: 0.593, 0.599, respectively), while a higher hazard of mortality was found in those with SQCC (HR: 1.496, 1.733 respectively). Other variables significantly associated with OS on multivariate analysis included age (> 65 years old) and history of surgery. Age > 65 years was associated with shorter OS (HR: 1.273 vs. age < 65 years). Patients who had a history of surgery tended to have longer OS (HR: 0.729 vs. those with no history of surgery).
Table 3. Multivariate analysis of overall survival and bladder cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic bladder cancer.
| Variables | Overall survival | Bladder cancer-specific survival | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | P value | Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | P value | |
| Age | ||||||
| ≤ 65 | 1.000 (reference) | |||||
| > 65 | 1.273 | 1.116 to 1.452 | < 0.001 | |||
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Married | 0.875 | 0.744 to 1.029 | 0.107 | 0.883 | 0.723 to 1.079 | 0.223 |
| Divorced/Separated | 1.027 | 0.836 to 1.262 | 0.799 | 1.044 | 0.806 to 1.352 | 0.744 |
| Widowed | 1.000 | 0.820 to 1.219 | 0.999 | 0.989 | 0.775 to 1.262 | 0.928 |
| T stage | ||||||
| T0 + Tx | 1.000 (reference) | |||||
| T1 | 0.984 | 0.802 to 1.207 | 0.875 | |||
| T2 | 1.000 | 0.829 to 1.206 | 1.000 | |||
| T3 | 0.944 | 0.731 to 1.218 | 0.657 | |||
| T4 | 1.028 | 0.838 to 1.262 | 0.788 | |||
| N stage | ||||||
| N0 + Nx | 1.000 (reference) | |||||
| N1 | 0.877 | 0.712 to 1.080 | 0.215 | |||
| N2 | 0.942 | 0.800 to 1.109 | 0.475 | |||
| N3 | 1.148 | 0.857 to1.537 | 0.355 | |||
| Surgery | ||||||
| No | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Yes | 0.729 | 0.630 to 0.845 | < 0.001 | 0.975 | 0.817 to 1.165 | 0.781 |
| Distant metastasis | ||||||
| Single site | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Multiple sites | 1.428 | 1.260 to 1.618 | < 0.001 | 1.605 | 1.367 to 1.885 | < 0.001 |
| Histology | ||||||
| Transitional cell carcinoma | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | ||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 0.593 | 0.427 to 0.825 | 0.002 | 0.599 | 0.389 to 0.922 | 0.020 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 1.496 | 1.121 to 1.995 | 0.006 | 1.733 | 1.225 to 2.452 | 0.002 |
| Small cell carcinoma | 0.860 | 0.678 to 1.091 | 0.213 | 0.782 | 0.568 to 1.078 | 0.134 |
DISCUSSION
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the SEER database to investigate the effect of histological sub-type on survival in patients with metastatic BC. Our study revealed several important findings. First, although the association between histological subtype and prognosis of BC has been investigated before, previous population-based studies were limited only to one rare histological subtype of BC such as SQCC [7–9], AD [18, 19] or SCC [4, 5, 20–24], or had relatively small sample sizes [6]. SQCC histology was reported to be an independent predictor of higher all-cause and bladder cancer-specific mortality as compared to TCC among patients with advanced stages (AJCC stage III/IV) [7]. However, some studies found no difference in CSS associated with SQCC and TCC [6, 8, 9, 25]. A large cohort study showed that patients with primary AD were not associated with worse prognosis than patients with TCC [26]. We found that AD patients had better survival outcomes than those with conventional TCC, while SQCC had worse outcomes than TCC. Further, there were no significant differences in OS and CSS between TCC and SCC patients in stage M1 group, which is in accordance with results of a previous study [27].
Secondly; we discovered a difference in metastatic tendency between the SQCC and SCC subtypes of BC. We found that SQCC metastasizes predominantly to lung (54.5%), while SCC metastasizes predominantly to liver (53.7%) and is least likely to metastasize to lung (3.7%) when compared with other histological subtypes of BC. These results are in line with studies conducted at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center [28] and Mayo Clinic [29]. Although brain metastases are a frequent complication in patients with SCC of the lung, they do not appear to be a common metastatic site in patients with SCC of the bladder [20, 22, 30]. We also found only one patient (1.9%) who developed brain metastases. Due to the low incidence of brain metastases in SCC of the bladder, prophylactic cranial irradiation is not routinely recommended. In cases of metastatic BC, transurethral resection, cystectomy combined with systemic chemotherapy has been proposed apart from partial cystectomy, and radiotherapy [22]. However, there is a paucity of robust data to inform appropriate tailored therapies for different histological subtypes of metastatic BC.
Limitations of our study include the retrospective design and its associated bias, such as selection bias for different treatment schedules. Moreover, due to the inherent limitations of the SEER database, data on specific metastatic sites prior to year 2010 were not available; therefore, the reference period for this study was 2010–2013. We also have no access to data on performance status and chemotherapy which are also important prognostic factors for patients with metastatic BC. So the use of claims based data for this approach will lead to somewhat insufficient estimations. Despite the above limitations, our study fills a gap with respect to histological subtypes and metastatic sites of BC.
In conclusion, based on the SEER database, we compared survival outcomes by histological subtype and site of metastatic lesions in patients with bladder cancer. Our findings suggest that squamous cell carcinoma and presence of multiple metastases portend a poorer prognosis in bladder cancer patients with distant metastasis. Obvious associations are reported with respect to metastatic frequency among patients with squamous and small cell carcinoma. Considering the poor prognosis of metastatic bladder cancer, we should keep an eye on those susceptible organs and sites once the histological subtype is determined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design and population
We identified all patients from 2010–2013 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with BC diagnosed as stage M1, according to the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) 7th edition. The permission to access the research data was obtained vide reference number 10263-Nov2015. This study was approved by the Clinical investigation ethics committee of the Soochow University (No. 2015103). We used International Classification of Disease for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3) to determine the histological sub-type. The codes selected were: transitional cell carcinoma (8120, 8122, 8130 and 8131); adenocarcinoma (8140, 8574, 8260 and 8255); squamous cell carcinoma (8052, 8070, 8071 and 8083); and small cell carcinoma (8041 and 8045).
Outcomes
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time period from the first diagnosis of bladder cancer to the date of all-cause death, while bladder cancer-specific survival (CSS) was determined until cancer-specific death or censoring, with the end of follow-up occurring on December 31, 2013.
Covariates
Demographic characteristics included age (< 65 and > 65 years old), gender (male and female), race (white, black and others), and marital status (single, married, divorced/separated and widowed). Clinical characteristics included pathological T and N stages, tumor grade (1-well differentiated, 2-moderately differentiated, 3-poorly differentiated and 4-undifferentiated), surgery, radiotherapy, distant metastasis (single site and multiple sites) as well as tumor histology (TCC, AD, SQCC and SCC).
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables of Table 1 and metastatic rates of Figure 3 are presented as percentages and analyzed by Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. In Figure 1 and Figure 2, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survivor functions and differences in OS, CSS probabilities were estimated using the log rank statistic. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess association of variables with survival. Variables showing a significant association with survival on univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA); two-sided value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The bar and pie charts were drawn using GraphPad Prism version 6.01 (San Diego, CA).
Acknowledgments
None.
Abbreviations
- (BC)
Bladder Cancer
- (OS)
Overall Survival
- (CSS)
Bladder cancer-specific survival
- (HR)
Hazard ratio
- (TCC)
Transitional cell carcinoma
- (SQCC)
Squamous cell carcinoma
- (AD)
Adenocarcinoma
- (SCC)
Small cell carcinoma
- (SEER)
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
- (AJCC)
American Joint Committee on Cancer
- (ICD-O-3)
International Classification of Disease for Oncology, Third Edition
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.
FUNDING
None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parkin DM. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008. pp. 12–20. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Lopez-Beltran A. Bladder cancer: clinical and pathological profile. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008. pp. 95–109. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Pasquier D, Barney B, Sundar S, Poortmans P, Villa S, Nasrallah H, Boujelbene N, Ghadjar P, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Senkus E, Oar A, Roelandts M, Amichetti M, et al. Small Cell Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder: A Retrospective, Multicenter Rare Cancer Network Study of 107 Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92:904–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Koay EJ, Teh BS, Paulino AC, Butler EB. A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis of small cell carcinoma of the bladder: epidemiology, prognostic variables, and treatment trends. Cancer. 2011;117:5325–33. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rogers CG, Palapattu GS, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Bastian PJ, Lotan Y, Gupta A, Vazina A, Gilad A, Sagalowsky AI, Lerner SP, Schoenberg MP. Clinical outcomes following radical cystectomy for primary nontransitional cell carcinoma of the bladder compared to transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 2006;175:2048–53. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00317-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Scosyrev E, Yao J, Messing E. Urothelial carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma of bladder: is survival different with stage adjustment. Urology. 2009;73:822–7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Abdollah F, Sun M, Jeldres C, Schmitges J, Thuret R, Djahangirian O, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Perrotte P, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI. Survival after radical cystectomy of non-bilharzial squamous cell carcinoma vs urothelial carcinoma: a competing-risks analysis. BJU Int. 2012;109:564–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Izard JP, Siemens DR, Mackillop WJ, Wei X, Leveridge MJ, Berman DM, Peng Y, Booth CM. Outcomes of squamous histology in bladder cancer: a population-based study. Urol Oncol. 2015;33:425.e7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Coleman RE. Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2001;27:165–76. doi: 10.1053/ctrv.2000.0210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Loehrer PJ, Einhorn LH, Elson PJ, Crawford ED, Kuebler P, Tannock I, Raghavan D, Stuart-Harris R, Sarosdy MF, Lowe BA. A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:1066–73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.7.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.der Maase H v, Sengelov L, Roberts JT, Ricci S, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, Moore MJ, Zimmermann A, Arning M. Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4602–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bajorin DF, Dodd PM, Mazumdar M, Fazzari M, McCaffrey JA, Scher HI, Herr H, Higgins G, Boyle MG. Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3173–81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bellmunt J, Albanell J, Paz-Ares L, Climent MA, González-Larriba JL, Carles J, de la Cruz JJ, Guillem V, Díaz-Rubio E, Cortés-Funes H, Baselga J. Pretreatment prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced urothelial tumors treated in a phase I/II trial with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine. Cancer. 2002;95:751–7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin CC, Hsu CH, Huang CY, Tsai YC, Huang KH, Cheng AL, Pu YS. Prognostic factors for metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil-based regimens. Urology. 2007;69:479–84. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stadler WM, Hayden A, von der Maase H, Roychowdhury D, Dogliotti L, Seymour L, Kaufmann D, Moore M. Long-term survival in phase II trials of gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced transitional cell cancer. Urol Oncol. 2002;7:153–7. doi: 10.1016/s1078-1439(02)00182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bellmunt J, Choueiri TK, Fougeray R, Schutz FA, Salhi Y, Winquist E, Culine S, der Maase H v, Vaughn DJ, Rosenberg JE. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1850–5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zaghloul MS, Nouh A, Nazmy M, Ramzy S, Zaghloul AS, Sedira MA, Khalil E. Long-term results of primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder: a report on 192 patients. Urol Oncol. 2006;24:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wright JL, Porter MP, Li CI, Lange PH, Lin DW. Differences in survival among patients with urachal and nonurachal adenocarcinomas of the bladder. Cancer. 2006;107:721–8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mukesh M, Cook N, Hollingdale AE, Ainsworth NL, Russell SG. Small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a 15-year retrospective review of treatment and survival in the Anglian Cancer Network. BJU Int. 2009;103:747–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08241.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Patel SG, Stimson CJ, Zaid HB, Resnick MJ, Cookson MS, Barocas DA, Chang SS. Locoregional small cell carcinoma of the bladder: clinical characteristics and treatment patterns. J Urol. 2014;191:329–34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bex A, Sonke GS, Pos FJ, Brandsma D, Kerst JM, Horenblas S. Symptomatic brain metastases from small-cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: The Netherlands Cancer Institute experience and literature review. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:2240–5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dores GM, Qubaiah O, Mody A, Ghabach B, Devesa SS. A population-based study of incidence and patient survival of small cell carcinoma in the United States, 1992–2010. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:185. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1188-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Koay EJ, Teh BS, Paulino AC, Butler EB. Treatment trends and outcomes of small-cell carcinoma of the bladder. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xylinas E, Rink M, Robinson BD, Lotan Y, Babjuk M, Brisuda A, Green DA, Kluth LA, Pycha A, Fradet Y, Faison T, Lee RK, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Impact of histological variants on oncological outcomes of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with radical cystectomy. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1889–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lughezzani G, Sun M, Jeldres C, Alasker A, Budäus L, Shariat SF, Latour M, Widmer H, Duclos A, Jolivet-Tremblay M, Montorsi F, Perrotte P, Karakiewicz PI. Adenocarcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: comparison between pathologic stage at radical cystectomy and cancer-specific mortality. Urology. 2010;75:376–81. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Geynisman DM, Handorf E, Wong YN, Doyle J, Plimack ER, Horwitz EM, Canter DJ, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A, Smaldone MC. Advanced small cell carcinoma of the bladder: clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes in 960 patients and comparison with urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2016;5:192–9. doi: 10.1002/cam4.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Abrahams NA, Moran C, Reyes AO, Siefker-Radtke A, Ayala AG. Small cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary clinicopathological study of 51 cases. Histopathology. 2005;46:57–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01980.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Choong NW, Quevedo JF, Kaur JS. Small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. The Mayo Clinic experience. Cancer. 2005;103:1172–8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Siefker-Radtke AO, Dinney CP, Abrahams NA, Moran C, Shen Y, Pisters LL, Grossman HB, Swanson DA, Millikan RE. Evidence supporting preoperative chemotherapy for small cell carcinoma of the bladder: a retrospective review of the M. D. Anderson cancer experience. J Urol. 2004;172:481–4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132413.85866.fc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]