Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2017 Feb 22;52(6):788–797. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.008

Table 3.

Pairwise Comparisons of Selected Outcomes Between Treatment Groupsa

Outcome Mean 12-month difference (95% CI) between groupsb
p-valuec
ILI vs. standard care Metformin vs. standard care ILI vs. metformin
Weight, kg −4.8 (−7.3, −2.2)
<0.001
−1.7 (−4.2, 0.9)
0.276
−3.1 (−5.7, −0.6)
0.013
Weight change, %d −6.0 (−9.1, −2.8)
<0.001
−2.1 (−5.2, 1.1)
0.261
−3.9 (−7.0, −0.7)
0.011
BMI, kg/m2 −2.0 (−3.0, −0.9)
<0.001
−0.7 (−1.8, 0.4)
0.254
−1.2 (−2.3, −0.2)
0.018
Waist circumference, cm −3.8 (−6.4, −1.3)
0.001
−1.7 (−4.2, 0.8)
0.259
−2.2 (−4.7, 0.3)
0.100
Hemoglobin A1c, % −0.12 (−0.26, 0.02)
0.108
0.00 (−0.14, 0.14)
0.999
−0.12 (−0.26, 0.02)
0.106
a

Comparisons of between-group mean differences in outcomes were conducted with post-hoc Tukey’s tests for multiple pairwise comparisons.

b

Between-group differences in outcome measures are expressed as the mean 12-month change in one treatment arm minus the mean 12-month change in the other treatment arm.

c

p-values express the significance of pairwise comparisons in outcome measures between treatment groups. Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).

d

Percent weight change is based on the weight change from baseline to 12 months, determined using the following formula: [(12-month weight − baseline weight)/baseline weight × 100].

ILI, intensive lifestyle intervention