Skip to main content
. 2017 May;72(5):276–283. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(05)04

Table 3.

Comparisons among groups for the results of the Expanded Protocol of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES-E).

Group Median Inquartil interval Multiple comparison Pairwise comparison
Aspect/Posture G1 53.0 49.0 – 54.0 X2=20.803 df=2 p<0.001* G1 = G2 p=0.068
G2 55.0 53.0 – 57.0 G1 ≠ CG p<0.001*
CG 58.0 55.0 – 60.0 G2 = CG p=0.068
Mobility G1 80.0 69.0 – 91.0 X2=16.997 gl=2 p<0.001* G1 = G2 p=1.000
G2 74.0 67.0 – 90.0 G1 ≠ CG p=0.002*
CG 99.0 86.0 – 108.0 G2 ≠ CG p=0.001*
Performance swallowing/mastication G1 34.0 29.0 – 40.0 X2=24.407 gl=2 p<0.001* G1 = G2 p=1.000
G2 36.0 30.0 – 39.0 G1 ≠ CG p<0.001*
CG 45.0 43.0 – 48.0 G2 ≠ CG p<0.001*
Total Score G1 172.0 148.0 – 176.0 X2=24.467 gl=2 p<0.001* G1 = G2 p=1.000
G2 168.0 153.0 – 181.0 G1 ≠ CG p<0.001*
CG 204.0 183.0 – 214.0 G2 ≠ CG p<0.001*

Legend: OMES-E= Expanded Protocol of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores; G1= patients submitted to open fracture reduction; G2= patients submitted to closed fracture reduction with maxillomandibular fixation; CG= control group; df= degrees of freedom;

*

= significant results (p<0.05); Kruskal-Wallis Dunn’s test.