Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 6;9(2):82–90. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjw050

Table 1.

Comparison of different methods for isolating axonal miRNAs.

Method Advantage Disadvantage Optimal application
Campenot chamber High purity, good for fluidic separation Not easily manageable, low yield of axonal RNA Cultured cells
Boyden chamber Easily manageable, high yield of RNA Not good for fluidic separation and live cell imaging Cultured explants/cells
Microfluidic chamber Easily manageable, high purity, very good for fluidic separation, good for live cell imaging Low yield of axonal RNA Cultured cells
Axoplasmic isolation High yield of axonal RNA, good in vivo system Not easily manageable In vivo preparation of RNA granules