Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar 31;51:149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.007

Table 2.

Comparisons of Content Ratings Across Reports of Intentional and Unintentional Mind Wandering Using Data Only from Participants Contributing Responses to Each of the Two Mind-Wandering Cells (N = 116, df = 115)

Mind-Wandering Type M SD t p
Content
Future Orientation Intentional 53.66 25.10 3.097 .002*
Unintentional 45.20 22.45
Past Orientation Intentional 35.04 22.21 −0.767 .444
Unintentional 36.74 22.40
Self-Referential Intentional 61.16 23.58 1.595 .114
Unintentional 57.19 22.34
Other-Referential Intentional 49.82 25.78 0.575 .566
Unintentional 48.48 22.89
Valence Intentional 59.44 19.54 2.165 .032
Unintentional 56.00 17.87
Images Intentional 49.79 23.14 −0.044 .965
Unintentional 49.90 22.64
Words Intentional 53.11 27.41 2.247 .027
Unintentional 47.84 24.28
Intrusiveness Intentional 45.04 21.81 1.299 .196
Unintentional 42.65 21.40
Vagueness Intentional 37.64 21.08 −5.067 <.001*
Unintentional 48.96 21.94

Note.

*

p < .006, 2-tailed; For detailed explanations of each content item, see Table 1.