Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Nov 22;11(4):445–453. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2016.11.001

Table II.

Age-adjusted associations between BMI categories and foot pain and foot disorders in men and women from the Framingham Foot Study (2002–2008)

Men Women
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Foot pain 25 – 29.99 vs <25 1.06 (0.67,1.67) 0.8182 1.49 (1.09,2.03) 0.0116
30 – 34.99 vs <25 1.17 (0.71,1.91) 0.5358 2.01 (1.43,2.81) <.0001
35+ vs <25 2.44 (1.38,4.33) 0.0022 3.21 (2.15,4.79) <.0001
Hallux valgus 25 – 29.99 vs <25 1.01 (0.68,1.50) 0.9693 0.97 (0.76,1.24) 0.7974
30 – 34.99 vs <25 0.84 (0.54,1.31) 0.4358 0.81 (0.61,1.09) 0.1692
35+ vs <25 0.61 (0.31,1.18) 0.1432 0.61 (0.40,0.93) 0.0207
Claw toes 25 – 29.99 vs <25 1.23 (0.46,3.27) 0.6764 1.05 (0.49,2.24) 0.9086
30 – 34.99 vs <25 1.89 (0.65,5.49) 0.2430 0.97 (0.38,2.45) 0.9402
35+ vs <25 3.37 (1.06,10.66) 0.0387 1.14 (0.33,3.91) 0.8351
Hammer toes 25 – 29.99 vs <25 0.93 (0.64,1.35) 0.7002 0.78 (0.58,1.05) 0.1028
30 – 34.99 vs <25 1.11 (0.74,1.66) 0.6160 0.94 (0.66,1.33) 0.7269
35+ vs <25 1.37 (0.79,2.37) 0.2597 1.13 (0.72,1.76) 0.5986
Overlapping
toes
25 – 29.99 vs <25 0.86 (0.47,1.57) 0.6255 0.97 (0.65,1.44) 0.8701
30 – 34.99 vs <25 1.03 (0.53,1.99) 0.9369 1.15 (0.70,1.88) 0.5891
35+ vs <25 1.06 (0.43,2.62) 0.9018 0.87 (0.40,1.88) 0.7178