Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 1;20(2):139–146. doi: 10.1007/s40477-017-0242-9

Table 2.

Comparison between different levels of physical activity

(m/s) p value (m/s) p value
Gastrocnemius L 2 mm: 0.411 Femoral biceps L 2 mm: 0.707
 Level 0: 1.80 ± 0.29  Level 0: 2.10 ± 0.72
 Level 1: 1.99 ± 0.46  Level 1: 2.23 ± 0.58
 Level 2: 1.90 ± 0.51  Level 2: 2.1 ± 0.57
Gastrocnemius L 4 mm: 0.769 Femoral biceps L 4 mm: 0.683
 Level 0: 1.89 ± 0.38  Level 0: 2.05 ± 0.56
 Level 1: 1.86 ± 0.38  Level 1: 2.01 ± 0.57
 Level 2: 1.95 ± 0.37  Level 2: 1.89 ± 0.46
Gastrocnemius R 2 mm: 0.603 Femoral biceps R 2 mm: 0.985
 Level 0: 1.82 ± 0.57  Level 0: 2.06 ± 0.52
 Level 1: 1.97 ± 0.49  Level 1: 2.03 ± 0.49
 Level 2: 1.85 ± 0.40  Level 2: 2.06 ± 0.45
Gastrocnemius R 4 mm: 0.784 Femoral biceps R 4 mm: 0.314
 Level 0: 1.89 ± 0.48  Level 0: 1.93 ± 0.51
 Level 1: 1.95 ± 0.42  Level 1: 2.17 ± 0.55
 Level 2: 1.85 ± 0.46  Level 2: 2.14 ± 0.44

ROI region of interest, R right, L left