Table 2.
Location* (Number of individuals tested) | S | η | H | Hd (SD) | π (SD) | π (JC) | K | D (p) | Fs (p) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xinjiang (27) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.484 (0.054) | 0.00063 (0.00007) | 0.00063 | 0.484 | 1.39947 (ns) | 1.514 (ns) |
Chongqing (9) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.639 (0.126) | 0.00101 (0.00026) | 0.00101 | 0.778 | 0.19590 (ns) | −0.108 (ns) |
Inner Mongolia (5) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.400 (0.237) | 0.00052 (0.00031) | 0.00052 | 0.400 | −0.81650 (ns) | 0.090 (ns) |
Shanxi (13) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.410 (0.154) | 0.00056 (0.00023) | 0.00056 | 0.436 | −0.90920 (ns) | −0.790 (ns) |
Hebei (14) | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0.571 (0.132) | 0.00084 (0.00024) | 0.00084 | 0.648 | −0.95732 (ns) | −1.362 (ns) |
Beijing (27) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.373 (0.101) | 0.00050 (0.00014) | 0.00050 | 0.387 | −0.53597 (ns) | −0.490 (ns) |
Tianjin (8) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.464 (0.200) | 0.00065 (0.00031) | 0.00065 | 0.500 | −1.31009 (ns) | −0.999 (ns) |
Hubei (22) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.255 (0.116) | 0.00034 (0.00016) | 0.00034 | 0.264 | −1.17515 (ns) | −1.310 (ns) |
Henan (12) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.303 (0.147) | 0.00039 (0.00019) | 0.00039 | 0.303 | −0.19492 (ns) | 0.297 (ns) |
Jilin (21) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.181 (0.104) | 0.00023 (0.00014) | 0.00023 | 0.181 | −0.61772 (ns) | −0.137 (ns) |
Liaoning (82) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.333 (0.058) | 0.00044 (0.00008) | 0.00044 | 0.342 | −0.24678 (ns) | −0.152 (ns) |
Jiangsu (44) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.241 (0.076) | 0.00031 (0.00010) | 0.00031 | 0.241 | 0.06730 (ns) | 0.551 (ns) |
Anhui (11) | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.473 (0.162) | 0.00066 (0.00025) | 0.00066 | 0.509 | −0.77815 (ns) | −0.659 (ns) |
Shanghai (12) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.303 (0.147) | 0.00039 (0.00019) | 0.00039 | 0.303 | −0.19492 (ns) | 0.297 (ns) |
Jiangxi (22) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 (0.000) | 0.00000 (0.00000) | 0.00000 | 0.000 | — | — |
Guangxi (21) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.495 (0.060) | 0.00064 (0.00009) | 0.00064 | 0.495 | 1.38372 (ns) | 1.403 (ns) |
Hainan (14) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.363 (0.130) | 0.00047 (0.00017) | 0.00047 | 0.363 | 0.32440 (ns) | 0.643 (ns) |
*The indices for the Shannxi, Hunan and Zhejiang samples were not calculated because the numbers of individuals were below 5; S, number of polymorphic (segregating) sites; η, total number of mutations; H, number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; K, average number of nucleotide differences; π(JC), nucleotide diversity with Jukes and Cantor correction; D, Tajima’s D statistic; Fs, Fu’s F test statistic; ns, not significant.