Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;11:266. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00266

Table 2.

Contrasts comparing low expectancy (L), partial reinforcement (P), and high expectancy (H).

Expectancy Uncertainty Combined
Stage 1: Fear conditioning
Pupil dilation t(62) 2.832 2.715 3.918
p 0.003** 0.004∗∗ 0.001***
β 0.398 0.382 0.551
Dwell time t(62) 4.000 2.205 4.468
p 0.001*** 0.016* 0.001***
β 0.232 0.128 0.260
Target fixation latency t(108) -2.657 -0.639 -2.427
p 0.011* 0.262 0.011*
β -0.313 -0.075 -0.286
Distracter fixation latency t(108) 2.596 0.130 2.048
p 0.013* 0.448 0.021*
β 0.306 0.015 0.241
Capture frequency (by shape) t(62) -3.230 -0.203 -2.575
p 0.003** 0.420 0.006**
β -0.687 -0.043 -0.548
Stage 2: Visual search task
Capture frequency (by color) t(62) 3.172 0.195 2.525
p 0.003** 0.423 0.007**
β 0.249 0.015 0.200
Capture duration t(21) 1.573 2.210 2.665
p 0.065 0.019* 0.017*
β 0.142 0.203 0.241

The expectancy contrast codes for a linear increase L < P < H with coefficients -1, 0, 1. The uncertainty contrast codes for the pattern L < P > H with coefficients -0.5, 1, -0.5. The third contrast explores the possibility that attention is influenced by a combination of both values and has coefficients -0.75, 0.50, 0.25. Tests are one-sided, to test for the specified patterns (and not for the inverse patterns); with p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Effect sizes are computed for standardized variables (strongest effect highlighted in bold).