Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;11:266. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00266

Table 3.

Pairwise comparison between low expectancy (L), partial reinforcement (P), and high expectancy (H) cues.

L-P L-H P-H
Stage 1: Fear conditioning
Pupil dilation t(62)
p
β
-3.767
0.001∗∗∗
-0.530
-2.832
0.003∗∗
-0.399
0.936
0.177
0.132
Dwell time t(62)
p
β
-3.910
0.001∗∗∗
-0.227
-0.400
0.001∗∗∗
-0.232
-0.090
0.536
-0.005
Target fixation latency t(108)
p
β
1.882
0.031
0.222
2.657
0.005∗∗
0.313
0.775
0.219
0.091
Distracter fixation latency t(108)
p
β
-1.411
0.081
-0.166
-2.596
0.005∗∗
-0.306
-1.186
0.119
-0.139
Capture frequency (by shape) t(62)
p
β
1.791
0.039
0.381
3.230
0.001∗∗∗
0.687
1.439
0.077
0.306
Stage 2: Visual search task
Capture frequency t(62)
p
β
-1.755
0.042
-0.138
-3.172
0.001∗∗∗
-0.249
-1.418
0.081
-0.112
Capture duration (by color) t(21)
p
β
-2.720
0.006∗∗
-0.247
-1.573
0.065
-0.142
1.137
0.134
0.104

Tests are one-sided and refer to the difference between means that is predicted by the contrast with the highest effect size in Table 2; p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. For example, tests for pupil dilation are L < P, L < H, and P > H.