Skip to main content
. 2017 May 8;19(5):e154. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7383

Table 2.

Costs per participant included in a cost-effectiveness analysis with a 1-year societal perspective, for App group versus Control group in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Variable Price per unita Amount used Cost


App group Control group App group Control group
Assessment 6.4 1 1 6.4 6.4
Treatment delivery 0 - - 0 0
Participant costs





Participant's time for PFMTb,c, mean (h) 29.61 15.66 9.91 463.7 293.4

Participant's time for laundryc, mean (h) 29.61 1.30 3.38 38.5 100.1

Incontinence aidsd, mean (n) 0.134 114.40 169.60 15.4 22.7

Extra laundry loadse, mean (n) 2.21 10.40 27.04 23.0 59.8
Total cost


547.0 482.4

aPrices are in euro (€), based on the 2013 year-end prices. Exchange rate was 1 EUR=8.94 SEK.

bPFMT: pelvic floor muscle training.

cBased on 2013 mean income for Swedish women with a similar educational level.

dBased on mean consumption at baseline (prices acquired from Apoteket).

eData from the literature [24].