Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;8:830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00830

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Extreme cases of images that serve to illustrate the space that best separates art images from non-art images (Figure 5). (A,B) show non-art images, while (C,D) show artworks. The image of the plant pattern in (A) is rich in structure (low Pa(22)) but is highly self-similar with little variability across the image (low Pf(12)). The large vista scene in (B) represents a highly homogeneous image that lacks structure like edges or different colors (high Pa(22)). The painting in (C) (A. R. Mengs, 1769) is atypical in that it contains large, relatively homogeneous regions (high Pf(12)), similar to objects. The painting in (D) (Monet, 1891) has a very rich structure (low Pa(22)) but it is not as self-similar (higher Pf(12)) as most images of plant patterns, vegetation or lichen growth patterns. See Table 2 for values of Pf(12) and Pa(22).