Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;8:830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00830

Table 1.

Mean classification scores (±SD) for art images vs. non-art images, according to different categories of artworks.

Category Accuracy Precision Recall
Western art (m = 1629) 0.939 ± 0.008 0.931 ± 0.005 0.926 ± 0.017
Chinese art (m = 210) 0.851 ± 0.012 0.354 ± 0.018 0.852 ± 0.038
Islamic art (m = 251) 0.957 ± 0.015 0.726 ± 0.083 0.964 ± 0.008
All combined (m = 2,090) 0.930 ± 0.004 0.942 ± 0.009 0.913 ± 0.010

While for Western art (JenAesthetics dataset) and Islamic art, the classification score is above 90%, it drops to 85% for Chinese art. Here, the mean precision is low, due to an overall lower richness (i.e., higher values of Pa(22)). Results are from a 5-fold cross-validation experiment. m, number of images in the dataset.