Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec;10(4):176–183.

Table 2.

comparing categorical variables between spinal and non-spinal groups

Variables Spinal
Nonspinal
P-value *
Count (%) Count (%)
Job Housewife 74(92.5%) 152 (89.4%) 0.499
Education grad Primary school 22 (27.8%) 65 (38.7%) 0.228
Primary to high school 48 (60.8%) 84 (50.0%0
University 9 (11.4%) 19 (11.3%)
Breastfeeding History 35 (43.8%) 84 (49.4%) 0.419
Gender of Neonate Male 44 (55.0%) 87 (51.2%) 0.590
Female 36 (45.0%) 83 (48.8%)
Ward Mothers 72 (90.0%) 142 (83.5%) 0.246
High Risk 8 (10.0%) 28 (16.5%)
Diabetes mellitus or Gestational Diabetes 6 (7.5%) 15 (8.8%) 0.811
Lactogenic medication 39 (48.8%) 72 (42.6%) 0.413
Feeding rout in two month age Breastfeeding 54 (67.5%) 121 (71.2%) 0.725
formula 4 (5.0%) 10 (5.9%)
Combination of Breastfeeding and formula 22 (27.5%) 39 (22.9%)
Completely formula feeding in two month age 4 (5.0%) 10 (5.1%) 0.518
*

chi square test was used