Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar;27(2):121–128. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v27i2.4

Table 5.

Relationship between socio-demographic characteristics and contraceptive uptake

Variable Using any form of contraception Total χ2 p - value

Yes (%)
n = 346
No (%)
n = 157
Age 2.9 0.564
Less than 20 48 (67.6) 23 (32.4) 71(100.0)
20 – 24 56 (68.3) 26 (31.7) 82(100.0)
25 – 29 83 (74.1) 29 (25.9) 112(100.0)
30 – 34 71 (70.3) 30 (29.7) 101(100.0)
35 and above 88 (64.2) 49 (35.8) 137(100.0)
Marital Status 9.1 0.028
Single 54 (66.7) 27 (33.3) 81(100.0)
Married 286 (69.6) 125 (30.4) 411(100.0)
Divorced/ Separated 5 (71.4) 2 (28.6) 7(100.0)
Widowed 0 (0.0) 4 (100.0) 4(100.0)
Religion 6.3 0.043
Christianity 253 (70.7) 105 (29.3) 358(100.0)
Islam 90 (66.2) 46 (33.8) 136(100.0)
Traditional 3 (33.3) 6 (66.7) 9(100.0)
Ethnicity 0.6 0.572*
Yoruba 337 (69.1) 151 (30.9) 488(100.0)
Non Yoruba 9 (60.0) 6 (40.0) 15(100.0)
Level of Education 8.3 0.041
No formal education 10 (45.5) 12 (54.5) 22(100.0)
Primary 53 (63.1) 31 (36.9) 84(100.0)
Secondary 164 (68.6) 75 (31.4) 239(100.0)
Tertiary 116 (73.4) 42 (26.6) 158(100.0)
Occupation 2.4 0.497
Civil Servant 121 (70.8) 50 (29.2) 171(100.0)
Self employed 159 (65.7) 83 (34.4) 242(100.0)
Student 62 (74.1) 22 (25.9) 84(100.0)
Unemployed 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) 6(100.0)
*

Fisher exact test