Table 2.
Variable | M | SD | Skewness | Kurtosis | Cut-off scores | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total sample | PSI-PD | 21.8 | 7.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | |
PSI-PCD-I | 17.3 | 4.9 | 1.4 | 1.5 | ||
PSI-DC | 19.2 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | ||
TOT-PSI | 58.2 | 15.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | >90 | |
EPDS | 3.9 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | >9 | |
STAI-S | 31.9 | 8.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 | >40 | |
STAI-T | 32.6 | 7.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | >40 | |
DAS-DCS | 54.1 | 6.5 | –0.5 | 0.0 | ||
DAS-AE | 30.6 | 4.8 | –0.3 | –0.6 | ||
DAS-DS | 9.4 | 1.9 | –0.6 | 0.0 | ||
DAS-DC | 16.5 | 3.2 | –0.3 | 0.7 | ||
TOT-DAS | 111 | 11.9 | –0.4 | 0.4 | <100 | |
Mothers | PSI-PD | 23 | 7.3 | 0.6 | –0.2 | |
PSI-PCD-I | 17.1 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 1.9 | ||
PSI-DC | 19.6 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | ||
TOT-PSI | 60 | 16.3 | 0.9 | 0.4 | >90 | |
EPDS | 4.9 | 3.8 | 0.6 | –0.3 | >9 | |
STAI-S | 33.3 | 8.9 | 1.1 | 0.8 | >40 | |
STAI-T | 34.2 | 8.1 | 0.4 | –0.5 | >40 | |
DAS-DCS | 54.2 | 6.4 | –0.4 | –0.3 | ||
DAS-AE | 30.2 | 4.7 | –0.6 | –0.5 | ||
DAS-DS | 9 | 2 | –0.6 | –0.3 | ||
DAS-DC | 15.8 | 3.1 | –0.5 | 0.1 | ||
TOT-DAS | 110 | 11.8 | –0.6 | 0.8 | <100 | |
Fathers | PSI-PD | 20.6 | 6.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | |
PSI-PCD-I | 17.4 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 1.3 | ||
PSI-DC | 18.7 | 5.9 | 1.5 | 2.6 | ||
TOT-PSI | 57 | 15.4 | 0.9 | 0.5 | >90 | |
EPDS | 2.9 | 2.9 | 1 | 0.9 | >9 | |
STAI-S | 30.5 | 7.3 | 1.2 | 2.6 | >40 | |
STAI-T | 31 | 7 | 0.9 | 1 | >40 | |
DAS-DCS | 53.9 | 6.7 | –0.5 | –0.2 | ||
DAS-AE | 31.1 | 4.8 | –0.2 | –0.8 | ||
DAS-DS | 9.5 | 1.8 | –0.6 | –0.1 | ||
DAS-DC | 17.1 | 3.2 | –0.2 | –0.1 | ||
TOT-DAS | 112 | 12.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | <100 |
PSI-PD, parental distress; PSI-PCD-I, parent–child dysfunctional interaction; PSI-DC, difficult child; TOT-PSI, total stress scores; EDPS, total scores of the EPDS scale; STAI-S, state anxiety; STAI-T, trait anxiety; DAS-DCS, dyadic consensus; DAS-AE, affectional expression; DAS-DS, dyadic satisfaction; DAS-DC, dyadic cohesion; TOT-DAS, total score of the DAS scale.