Table 5.
Association between cumulative average estrogen and progestin dose/potency and ovarian cancer risk adjusting for duration of OC use among ever OC users (1989-2013)
| Multivariate-adjusted modelsa | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | HR | 95% CI | Cases | HR | 95% CI | |
| Cumulative average estrogen doseb | ||||||
| < Median | ≥ Median | |||||
| Average progestin dose | ||||||
| < Median | 48 | 1.00 | (Ref.) | 31 | 1.24 | (0.77, 2.00) |
| ≥ Median | 20 | 0.91 | (0.54, 1.52) | 92 | 1.34 | (0.92, 1.95) |
| Cumulative average estrogen potency | ||||||
| < Median | ≥ Median | |||||
| Average progestin potency4 | ||||||
| < Median | 34 | 1.00 | (Ref.) | 19 | 0.99 | (0.56, 1.74) |
| ≥ Median | 55 | 1.16 | (0.75, 1.80) | 76 | 1.13 | (0.74, 1.75) |
Adjusted for age (months), calendar time, parity (number of pregnancies), tubal ligation (yes/no), breastfeeding duration (months), missing breastfeeding (yes/no), body mass index (kg/m2), duration of OC use (months)
Median values were updated at each follow-up cycle