Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 24;122(2):119–126. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2017.1294636

Table 3.

Zero-inflated negative binomial regression analysis, adjusted for an excess of zero values for associations between investigated variables; dependent variable: PGSI.

Model I. Analysis of the chance of not becoming susceptible to developing gambling problems.a
OR p 95% CI
Age 0.48 0.001 0.30 0.75
ADHD symptoms index 0.95 0.041 0.90 1.00
Gambling frequency index 0.46 0.009 0.26 0.82
ADHD symptoms × Gambling frequency index 0.92 0.023 0.85 0.99
Model II. Analysis of adolescents already susceptible to problem gambling.b
IRR p 95% CI
ADHD symptoms index 1.03 0.031 1.003 1.07
Gambling frequency index 1.34 <0.001 1.20 1.51
Sex (ref: boys) 0.25 <0.001 0.16 0.38
Sex × Gambling frequency index 1.67 <0.001 1.34 2.13
a

Model I: adjusted for covariates sex and parents’ country of birth.

b

Model II: adjusted for covariate age.