Table S2.
Species | OP | OD | Description |
Mouse | Absent | Absent | No OP columns by electrophysiological recordings found (107), although indications for the clustering of cells of similar OPs were found |
No OD columns by autoradiography (108) and electrophysiological recordings (107, 109) found | |||
Rat | Absent | Absent | No OP columns by calcium imaging (26) and electrophysiological recordings (110) found (ref. 28 has a review) |
No OD columns present (ref. 43 has a review), although inputs from both eyes are largely segregated in the binocular region of V1 (111) | |||
Rabbit | Absent | Absent | No OP columns by electrophysiological recordings found (112), although OPs appeared to be arranged in clusters |
No OD columns found by autoradiography (96) | |||
Gray squirrel | Absent | Absent | No OP columns by electrophysiological and optical imaging found (27) |
No OD columns by autoradiography found (113) | |||
Agouti | Unknown | Unknown | Manifestation of visual cortex maps is unknown |
Sheep | Present | Present | The presence of OP columns was shown by a gradual shift in OP in ref. 61, but the exact characteristic of the map is unknown |
The presence of OD columns was also found electrophysiologically in ref. 61, although the existence of an OD map is controversial, because the work in ref. 100 could find only slight indications for a structured map by autoradiography | |||
Ferret | Intermediate | Intermediate | The presence of OP maps has been described by optical recordings (114, 115) but categorized as less regular and more discontinuous than the cat map. Therefore, we classified it as intermediate |
The presence of OD columns has been described by autoradiography (116) and optical recordings (117) and characterized as less pronounced than in primates (117). Therefore, we classified it as intermediate (44) | |||
Cat | Highly developed | Intermediate | OP map found by optical recordings (9, 115, 117, 118) and calcium imaging (10) |
OD map found by optical recordings (117, 118) and autoradiographic and electrophysiological recordings (21) but characterized as less pronounced than in primates (117). Therefore, we classified it as intermediate (44) | |||
Tree shrew | Intermediate | Absent | OP map has been shown by optical recordings (14, 63), but map contains extensive regions of a stripe-like pattern instead of the classical pinwheel pattern. Therefore, we classified it as intermediate |
No OD columns found by the pattern of LGN projections (64), electrophysiologically (65), and by autoradiography (66) | |||
Marmoset | Highly developed | Intermediate | OP map has been shown by optical recordings (ref. 119 has a review) |
OD map in some species but not in others found by optical recordings and if it appeared relatively weak and as a mosaic of irregular bands or islands (120). Expression of OD maps has been reported (121) but remains controversial (ref. 119 has a discussion). Therefore, we classified it as intermediate | |||
Galago | Highly developed | Intermediate | OP map has been reported by optical recordings (14, 122) |
OD map has been reported by optical recordings in most of the tested animals but not all (122), and CO blobs are not centered to OD columns (122). Therefore, we classified it as intermediate | |||
Owl monkey | Highly developed | Intermediate | OP map has been shown by optical imaging (123, 124) |
OD map is cryptic, because there is no known anatomical substrate of OD columns except for one reported owl monkey (125), but a functional OD map is visible in the superficial layers (124). OD columns in owl monkeys are more patch-like or circular than the stripe-like OD columns seen in other monkeys, and CO blobs are not centered to OD columns (124). Therefore, we classified it as intermediate | |||
Squirrel monkey | Highly developed | Intermediate | OP map has been reported by ref. 126 |
Intermediate OD columns, because they are less well-segregated than in macaques (43) and capriciously expressed in different individuals (57). Furthermore, CO domains have been reported to not adhere strictly to the center of OD domains (43). Therefore, we classified it as intermediate (44) | |||
Macaque | Highly developed | Highly developed | Reference example of OP and OD map |
OP map has been found by electrophysiological (127) and optical recordings (8) | |||
OD map has been found by electrophysiological recordings in combination with a silver staining method (128), by autoradiography (129), and by optical recordings (8) | |||
Map shows pinwheel singularities at the center of OD columns and linear zones at the edges of OD columns; isoorientation bands tend to intersect the borders of OD columns at angles of 90°, and CO blobs are in the center of OD columns (58, 130, 131) | |||
Chimpanzee | Unknown | Highly developed | Presence of OP map is unknown |
OD map has been found by autoradiography (132) | |||
Human | Highly developed | Highly developed | OP map has been reliably reported by fMRI, and striking similarities with the known spatial features of monkeys were found (133) |
OD map has been reliably reported by fMRI (133, 134) and cytochrome oxidase staining of human postmortem tissue (135). A similar network of patches as in macaque has been described (58, 135) |
Map structure for OP and eye preference (OD) is characterized as absent, unknown, present, intermediate, or strong. The explanation for the characterization is given by the description that contains the supporting references. CO, cytochrome oxidase; LGN, lateral geniculate nucleus.