Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018 Apr-Jun;41(2):77–84. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000110

Table 2.

Validity (Pearson r) of the instrumented modified Clinical Test for the Sensory Interaction on Balance (i-mCTSIB) with Sensory Organization Test (SOT) using accelerometer data in anterior-posterior (AP) direction. Mean, range, and standard deviation presented. Correlations significant at p ˂ .05 (2-tailed) represented in bold. Validity of i-mCTSIB Composite score was similar when correlated to SOT Composite scores calculated with all 6 conditions and modified Composite scores with conditions 1, 2, 4 and 5.

AP Direction Mean (range); SD r (p)
Condition i-mCTSIB [m] ([m/s2]) SOT
Composite
[Modified Composite]
0.63 (0.29–1.49); 0.25 75.00 (33–83); 10.99
[76.05 (29–88);11.68]
0.64 (˂0.01)
0.63 (˂0.01)
aEO (C1)
eEO (C1)
0.32 (0.19–0.67); 0.13 92.90 (88–96); 2.20 0.43 (<0.05)
bEC (C2)
fEC (C2)
0.44 (0.19–0.95); 0.20 87.96 (78–95); 3.90 −0.16 (0.45)
cEOF (C3)
gEOS (C4)
0.49 (0.27–0.82); 0.14 80.50 (16–91); 14.24 0.60 (˂0.01)
dECF (C4)
hECS (C5)
0.91 (0.35–2.94); 0.57 62.00 (0–82); 17.87 0.54 (˂0.01)

i-mCTSIB Conditions

a

EO = eyes open, firm surface (C1)

b

EC = eyes closed, firm surface (C2)

c

EOF = eyes open, foam surface (C3)

d

ECF = eyes closed, foam surface (C4)

SOT Conditions

e

EO = eyes open, firm surface (C1)

f

EC = eyes closed, firm surface (C2)

g

EOS = eyes open, sway-referenced support (C4)

h

ECS = eyes closed, sway-referenced support (C5)