Table 4.
CTL | LINNIT | SEM | Effect | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rumen | Cecum | Rumen | Cecum | Treatment | DCa | Treatment × DC | ||
Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii | 0.360 | 0.504 | 0.439 | 0.596 | 0.046 | 0.093 | 0.005 | 0.888 |
Methanobrevibacter ruminantium | 0.198 | 0.198 | 0.154 | 0.085 | 0.030 | 0.013 | 0.260 | 0.254 |
unclassified Group9 | 0.133 | 0.123 | 0.113 | 0.176 | 0.032 | 0.651 | 0.484 | 0.336 |
Group10 sp | 0.123 | – | 0.138 | – | 0.014 | 0.713 | 0.000 | 0.713 |
Methanosphaera sp ISO3-F5 | 0.044 | 0.024 | 0.053 | 0.013 | 0.009 | 0.924 | 0.005 | 0.340 |
Group12 sp | 0.036 | – | 0.028 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.505 | 0.000 | 0.499 |
unclassified Methanosphaera | 0.033 | 0.006 | 0.014 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.457 | 0.136 | 0.306 |
Group9 sp | 0.021 | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.228 | 0.015 | 0.222 |
unclassified Methanobrevibacter | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.016 | 0.023 | 0.004 | 0.413 | 0.835 | 0.230 |
Methanobrevibacter boviskoreani | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.018 | 0.007 | 0.858 | 0.604 | 0.739 |
Methanosphaera stadtmanae | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.020 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.126 |
Group8 sp | 0.005 | 0.116 | 0.001 | 0.067 | 0.016 | 0.252 | 0.001 | 0.329 |
Methanobacterium alkaliphilum | 0.003 | – | 0.001 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.155 | 0.363 | 0.033 |
Group11 sp | 0.003 | – | 0.001 | – | 0.001 | 0.225 | 0.078 | 0.225 |
unclassified_Methanobacteriaceae | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.457 | 0.136 | 0.306 |
Methanobrevibacter oralis | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.211 | 0.289 | 0.307 |
unclassified Methanomicrobiaceae | 0.000 | – | – | – | 0.000 | 0.326 | 0.326 | 0.326 |
unclassified | 0.000 | – | 0.000 | – | 0.000 | 0.937 | 0.169 | 0.937 |
Methanobacterium formicicum | – | – | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.277 | 0.388 | 0.388 |
Methanimicrococcus blatticola | – | – | 0.000 | – | 0.000 | 0.326 | 0.326 | 0.326 |
digestive compartment.
Values are means of eight individual measures; data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA in R.