Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;7:209. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00209

Table 6.

Comparative table of the three methods used.

Isolates Comb. Check. Etest Time kill (MICxMIC)
Drug A+B FICI FICI 16 × 16 8 × 8 4 × 4 2 × 2 1 × 1 0.5 × 0.5 0.25 × 0.25 0.125 × 0.125
(Δ Log 10)
3 C+I 1.20 1.16 0.60 −0.34 −0.84 −0.60 −3.61 −0.68 0.00
C+M 1.05 1.60 0.74 −0.74 0.08 −0.60 −1.38 −0.06 0.00
4 C+I 1.04 2.00 0.01 0.05 0.02 −0.10 −0.01 −0.08 −1.37
C+M 1.04 2.00 −0.09 −0.23 −0.26 −0.33 −0.24 −0.26 −1.51
8 C+I 1.41 2.00 −0.01 −0.01 −0.05 0.00 0.01 −0.02 −1.50
C+M 1.49 2.00 −0.01 −0.02 −0.03 −0.04 0.02 −0.02 −1.58
13 C+I 1.41 1.60 0.14 0.05 −0.12 −0.42 −2.65 −2.72 −2.71
C+M 1.09 1.60 0.00 0.11 −0.11 −0.13 −0.37 −2.08 −2.16
21 C+I 1.23 1.50 −0.01 0.00 −0.04 −0.03 −0.03 −0.02 −0.04
C+M 1.23 2.00 0.02 −0.01 0.00 −0.03 −0.03 −0.02 −0.02
24 C+I 1.05 1.25 0.00 −0.34 −0.20 −2.86 −0.22 −0.05 −0.01
C+M 0.98 1.75 0.40 −0.34 0.00 −3.20 −0.14 0.00 0.00
30 C+I 1.83 1.00 0.03 −0.02 −0.04 −0.02 −0.03 0.01 −0.34
C+M 1.72 1.75 0.00 −0.03 −0.01 −0.02 −0.08 −0.14 0.02
32 C+I 1.05 2.00 0.14 −1.00 −3.67 −3.68 −3.06 −0.24 0.00
C+M 0.94 1.75 0.00 −1.00 −3.27 −3.68 −0.13 0.03 0.01
34 C+I 0.99 1.25 −0.01 0.00 0.00 −1.25 −1.49 −1.54 −0.05
C+M 0.78 2.00 0.02 0.02 0.04 −1.21 −1.43 −0.16 0.04
44 C+I 1.05 1.75 0.05 −0.05 −0.03 0.09 −1.33 −1.54 −0.30
C+M 0.61 1.16 −0.01 −0.10 −0.03 0.05 −1.33 −0.21 0.07
48 C+I 1.42 1.40 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.44 0.00 −1.38
C+M 1.13 0.88 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.53 0.11 −1.43
51 C+I 1.09 1.50 −0.01 −0.02 0.00 −1.07 −1.45 −1.59 −0.03
C+M 0.81 2.00 0.01 0.03 0.03 −1.06 −1.42 −0.18 −0.02
63 C+I 1.33 1.40 −0.03 −0.03 −0.04 −0.03 −1.91 −1.46 −0.31
C+M 1.53 0.75 0.00 −0.01 0.03 −0.02 −1.33 −0.42 −0.14
65 C+I 1.46 1.25 −0.04 −0.07 −0.07 −1.67 −1.74 −0.15 0.00
C+M 1.05 1.25 −0.08 −0.12 −0.11 −1.71 −0.98 0.00 0.02
69 C+I 0.81 1.25 0.07 0.03 0.01 −0.09 −1.51 −1.63 −1.72
C+M 0.92 2.00 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.04 −1.38 −1.48 −1.38
70 C+I 0.68 2.00 −0.05 −0.05 −0.06 −1.37 −1.30 −1.51 −0.03
C+M 0.72 2.00 0.05 0.02 −0.04 −1.41 −1.48 −1.55 −0.06
71 C+I 2.54 2.00 −0.07 0.08 −0.05 0.09 −0.06 0.05 −0.04
C+M 2.09 2.00 0.00 −0.14 −0.11 0.00 −0.05 −0.03 −0.10
73 C+I 0.67 1.25 −0.14 −0.07 −0.01 −0.66 −1.39 −1.50 −1.58
C+M 0.66 1.08 −0.12 −0.11 0.05 −0.64 −1.35 −1.51 −1.57
75 C+I 0.92 1.00 −0.10 −0.11 −0.12 −0.29 −0.94 −0.02 0.00
C+M 0.68 0.85 −0.09 −0.09 −0.11 −0.29 −0.91 0.01 0.05
78 C+I 0.83 1.60 0.09 0.02 0.00 −0.07 −0.08 −0.04 −0.10 0.00
C+M 0.93 1.00 0.05 0.06 −0.02 −0.07 −0.07 −0.04 −0.10
93 C+I 0.70 1.25 0.00 −0.07 −0.93 −0.40 −0.32 −0.07 0.21
0.76 1.50 0.33 0.16 0.18 −0.07 0.10 0.11 −0.09

C+I, Col-Imipenem; C+M, Col-meropenem. Comb, Combination; Check, Checkerboard. Synergistic effect is determined by ETEST and checkerboard whenever ∑FICI ≤ 0.5 was detected, and additivity was determined for the range 0.5< ∑FICI< 2. All the tested isolates showed additivity in both techniques. The values in bold represent a synergistic effect by time kill curve (< −2). At 2 × 2MIC: Synergistic rate: 4.7% for C+I and C+M respectively, at 1 × 1MIC: synergistic rate: 14.3% for C+I, and 9.5% for C+M, at 0.5 × 0.5MIC synergistic rate 14.3% for C+l, and 4.7% for C+M, at 0.25 × 0.25MIC synergistic rate of 4.7% for C+I and C+M, respectively.