Table 3.
PE vs SE | Exp 1a | Exp 2a | Exp 3a | Exp 4a |
Top 20 GO terms | 95 | 65 | 85 | 100 |
Top 50 | 84 | 94 | 88 | 96 |
Top 100 | 79 | 91 | 94 | 98 |
Top 200 | 84 | 86 | 94 | 97 |
Top 300 | 88 | 87 | 85 | 99 |
PE vs NS | Exp 2b | Exp 3b | Exp 4b | |
Top 20 GO terms | 40 | 75 | 95 | |
Top 50 | 86 | 84 | 90 | |
Top 100 | 88 | 91 | 96 | |
Top 200 | 78 | 95 | 96 | |
Top 300 | 80 | 88 | 96 |
aPercentage concordance in the top GO terms (by FDR) found using the goana function of limma when using the SE and PE datasets for each of the experiments
bPercentage concordance in the top 20 GO terms (by FDR) found using the goana function of limma when using the SE and PE datasets for each of the experiments