Skip to main content
. 2017 May 24;4:17020. doi: 10.1038/hortres.2017.20

Table 2. QTLs mapped in the greenhouse experiment.

QTL/ phenotype Marker Position (bp) Position (cM) LOD value Explained variance (%) Dominance Additive
FT SFvb4_7870713 Fvb4: 7870713 20.012 7.1 16.1 −0.137 1.807
FT Bx083/ SFvb4_28667943 Fvb4: 28667943 47.485 6.58 15 0.427 1.784
FT TFL1 Fvb6: 10371025 40.306 7.59 17 −4.380 1.623
FT SFvb7_16204472 Fvb7: 16204472 24.895 5.45 12.6 0.232 1.775
FT SFvb7_21710529 Fvb7: 21710529 14.215 5.16 12 −0.212 1.617
BC SFvb4_29399865 Fvb4: 29399865 53.184 8.8 20.5 −0.053 −0.552
BC SFvb5_25913832 Fvb5: 25913832 65.718 9.78 22.5 0.151 −0.582
RU SFvb4_29399865 Fvb4: 29399865 53.184 6.56 15 0.536 −1.382
RU SFvb5_25814268 Fvb5: 25814268 64.908 6.13 14.1 0.899 −1.271

Abbreviations: BC, branch crowns; FT, flowering time; RU, runners

The most significant markers for each QTL, their positions and different genetic parameters are shown. Negative or positive value for dominance indicate that the allele of ‘H4’ or ‘FV’ parent has larger effect on the phenotype, respectively.