Skip to main content
. 2017 May;18(5):383–392. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1600141

Table 5.

Comparison of lobetyolin models with different spectral pretreatments

Pretreatment LV R C RMSEC (μg/ml) R CV RMSECV (μg/ml) R P RMSEP (μg/ml)
Raw spectra 10 0.9964 1.21 0.9743 3.23 0.9587 5.18
MSC+NWa+1st 4 0.9263 5.41 0.8132 8.47 0.8641 8.17
MSC+SGb+1st 8 0.9928 1.73 0.8900 6.56 0.8936 7.24
MSC+SGb+2nd 9 0.9913 1.89 0.8516 3.60 0.8015 9.92
MSC+SGb 9 0.9953 1.38 0.9747 3.21 0.9716 4.68
SNV+SGb 10 0.9957 1.33 0.9746 3.22 0.9710 4.73
SGb 10 0.9958 1.32 0.9755 3.17 0.9643 5.01
a

Norris-Williams (NW) derivation using a 5-point smoothing and a gap size of 5;

b

Savitzky-Golay (SG) polynomial derivative filter with a 7-point window and a third-order polynomial. MSC: multiplicative scatter correction; SNV: standard normal variate; LV: latent variable; R: correlation coefficient; RMSE: root mean squares error; C: calibration; CV: cross-validation; P: prediction